2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.11.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Voxel Size in the Diagnostic Ability of Cone Beam Tomography to Evaluate Simulated External Root Resorption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
133
1
15

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 171 publications
(159 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
10
133
1
15
Order By: Relevance
“…19 When the CBCT images were compared with micro CT and laser scanning, the authors found that volumetric measurements made with CBCT were all similar for voxel sizes up to 200 mm. [17][18] Liedke et al 20 recommended a minimal voxel resolution of 0.3 mm for the detection of external root resorption. In this study, segmentation and volumetric measurements were done on 0.2 mm CBCT images.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 When the CBCT images were compared with micro CT and laser scanning, the authors found that volumetric measurements made with CBCT were all similar for voxel sizes up to 200 mm. [17][18] Liedke et al 20 recommended a minimal voxel resolution of 0.3 mm for the detection of external root resorption. In this study, segmentation and volumetric measurements were done on 0.2 mm CBCT images.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of those, four assessed the detection of root fractures [18][19][20][21] (and used the clinical truth (an induced root fracture) as the gold standard), three assessed internal or external root resorption [22][23][24] also using the clinical truth as the gold standard, three assessed caries lesion detection [25][26][27] (and used sectioning and histology of the teeth as the gold standard), one assessed the detection of erosions in the temporomandibular joint [28] (using the clinical truth as the gold standard), and one assessed the presence of root canals in molars [29] using sectioning and histology of the teeth as the gold standard. The remaining eight studies were based on numerical outcomes measured in the images.…”
Section: Review Search Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Liedke et al (2009) telah mengukur 59 batang gigi daripada imej yang diambil dengan tomografi iCAT pada resolusi isi padu piksel 0.4, 0.3 dan 0.2 mm. Beliau mendapati CBCT merupakan pendekatan yang boleh dipercayai untuk menganalisis penyerapan akar gigi sekiranya resolusi isi padu piksel kurang daripada 0.3 mm.…”
Section: Perbincanganunclassified
“…Beliau mendapati CBCT merupakan pendekatan yang boleh dipercayai untuk menganalisis penyerapan akar gigi sekiranya resolusi isi padu piksel kurang daripada 0.3 mm. Saiz isi padu piksel yang rendah, manakala pendedahan dos radiasi yang tinggi pada pesakit telah dipilih bagi memperoleh imej untuk menghasilkan resolusi tinggi (Liedke et al 2009). Walau bagaimanapun, dalam kajian ini, pilihan saiz isi padu piksel sedia ada adalah 0.076, 0.1 dan 0.2 mm dengan Kodak 9000 3D; saiz isi padu piksel pada 0.2 mm telah dipilih kerana ia dianggap optimum untuk meminimumkan dos radiasi tetapi masih mencukupi daripada segi resolusi untuk mengukur penyerapan akar gigi.…”
Section: Perbincanganunclassified