1996
DOI: 10.2307/2269569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Vegetational Structure on Capture of Salt and Nutrient Aerosols in a Maine Peatland

Abstract: Concentrations and fluxes of Cl‐ and Na+ in bulk precipitation and throughfall in an inland, acidic peatland (Alton Bog, Maine, USA) reveal the influence of canopy structure on the deposition rate of road‐salt and nutrient‐bearing aerosols. Alton Bog borders a four‐lane highway that is salted in winter. In open areas of the peatland steep gradients occurred in both Cl‐ and Na+ influxes in bulk precipitation and in surface‐water concentrations within ≈ 200 m of the highway. In winter, wooded sites had consisten… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The total uptake of K reached the predrainage level only after about 40 years following drainage. At this stage, the tree stand was already well developed and could thus itself affect the element balance of the site through the increased interception of (dry) deposition [ Schauffler et al , 1996]. This interception may be crucial for the K regime of forested peatland sites [ Laiho et al , 1999].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total uptake of K reached the predrainage level only after about 40 years following drainage. At this stage, the tree stand was already well developed and could thus itself affect the element balance of the site through the increased interception of (dry) deposition [ Schauffler et al , 1996]. This interception may be crucial for the K regime of forested peatland sites [ Laiho et al , 1999].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. The higher concentrations of Na in the restored section were probably a consequence of increase interception of the precipitations in comparison with the bare surface of the non-restored section (Schauffler et al 1996), where Na is more likely to be leached. More changes, particularly in the nutrient content of the peat, are likely to occur when new peat starts to form and accumulate.…”
Section: Changes In Peat Chemistry Over Timementioning
confidence: 90%
“…Bulk precipitation did not, in fact, totally explain the cation contents in pore‐water on the ombrotrophic parts, which are probably due to the mire surface trapping droplets and solid particles more effectively than the funnels used for collecting bulk precipitation (see Oldfield et al . 1979; Schauffer et al . 1996).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lower contribution of precipitation to Ca 2+ , Mg 2+ and Na + concentrations in mire pore-water in the minerotrophic parts compared with the ombrotrophic parts can be explained as a primary effect of mineral soil water inflows along the mire margins. Bulk precipitation did not, in fact, totally explain the cation contents in pore-water on the ombrotrophic parts, which are probably due to the mire surface trapping droplets and solid particles more effectively than the funnels used for collecting bulk precipitation (see Oldfield et al 1979;Schauffer et al 1996). Calcium was depleted in ombrotrophic pore-water at Wölfl Moor compared with precipitation very probably because of the greater cation exchange activity of living Sphagna, as indicated by the higher Ca concentration in ombrotrophic Sphagnum plants at the Italian mire (see below).…”
Section:         -mentioning
confidence: 99%