2003
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2745.2003.00773.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of mineral and nutrient input on mire bio‐geochemistry in two geographical regions

Abstract: Summary 1We assessed the role of climatic conditions and the effects of different, long-term atmospheric depositions in controlling the mineral and nutrient contents in pore-water, surface peat and in living Sphagna at a boreo-nemoral mire in Sweden and an alpine mire in Italy. 2 The terrestrial contribution of Ca 2+ , Mg 2+ and in bulk precipitation was much greater at the Italian mire, in accordance with the different bedrock in the region and the higher level of atmospheric pollution. 3 At both mires, the c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
3
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet, the Sphagnum concentration values are thought to be quite reasonable because of the huge amount of samples investigated, whereas deposition monitoring data are restricted to some solitary monitoring sites only, which might not reflect reasonably well the atmospheric deposition into the peat bogs studied. However, Proctor (1992) and Bragazza et al (2003) found that the bulk precipitation data did not sufficiently explain the cation contents in surface or pore-waters of ombrotrophic peat bogs. They con- Atmospheric deposition [kg ha -1 a -1 ]…”
Section: Sphagnummentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Yet, the Sphagnum concentration values are thought to be quite reasonable because of the huge amount of samples investigated, whereas deposition monitoring data are restricted to some solitary monitoring sites only, which might not reflect reasonably well the atmospheric deposition into the peat bogs studied. However, Proctor (1992) and Bragazza et al (2003) found that the bulk precipitation data did not sufficiently explain the cation contents in surface or pore-waters of ombrotrophic peat bogs. They con- Atmospheric deposition [kg ha -1 a -1 ]…”
Section: Sphagnummentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Indeed, at both mires pH, alkalinity, Ca 2+ , Mg 2+ , Al 3+ , Mn 2+ , and SiO 2 concentrations in pore-water were higher in the lagg fen than in the expanse (Shotyk 1988;Gerdol 1995;Vitt et al 1995;Reeve et al 1996;Mullen et al 2000;Tahvanainen et al 2002). Geochemical differences in pore-water between the Swedish and the Italian mire are the consequence of different environmental conditions at the two sites concerning atmospheric chemistry and climate (Bragazza et al 2003). In particular, higher values of pH and Mg 2+ in pore-water at the Italian mire (P < 0.05) are related to the higher deposition of alkaline dust on Wölfl Moor in accordance with the higher pH of precipitation at Wölfl Moor (pH = 5.19, Tait and Thaler 2000), compared to Ryggmossen (pH = 4.64, Swedish Environmental Research Institute, unpublished data).…”
Section: Minerotrophy and Ombrotrophy In Relation To Hydrological Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although some species of bryophytes take up nutrients from the substrate upon which they are growing (Ayres et al 2006), most obtain much of their nutritional requirements by intercepting ions from rainwater. They are therefore sensitive indicators of their environment (Turner et al 2001) that have been used to predict past levels of atmospheric deposition (Bragazza et al 2003(Bragazza et al , 2005 and closely reflect the level of external pollutant loads (Turner et al 2001). As a consequence there has been considerable interest in the potential use of bryophyte responses as bio-indicators of N deposition in a range of ecosystems (Pitcairn and Fowler 1995;Gidman et al 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%