2010
DOI: 10.1139/f09-169
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of spatial positioning within stream networks on fish assemblage structure in the Kansas River basin, USA

Abstract: We found that riverine confluences had localized effects (within 20 km) on stream fish assemblages of the Kansas River basin. The majority of variation in fish assemblages occurred from east to west and along a stream size gradient. After controlling for the influences of longitude and stream size, distance of sample sites from streams 5th order accounted for a small proportion of taxonomic variability. However, species richness was significantly higher and assemblage structure was different in tributary strea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
55
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
(38 reference statements)
2
55
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There are other reasons why confluences are important for river biodiversity including: provision of nutrient or prey subsidies (Wipfli and Gregovitch, 2002;Fernandes et al, 2004;Wellard-Kelly, 2013); the presence of unique confluence-zone habitats (Nakamoto, 1994;Franks et al, 2002;Kreb and Budiono, 2005); the amplification of competition amongst species (Besemer et al, 2013); and bi-directional filtering that affects organism dispersal (e.g. Thornbrugh and Gido, 2010;Wilson and McTammany, 2014;Czeglédi et al, 2015). Confluences may therefore be biodiversity hotspots in river networks (Benda et al, 2004b), where added biological value partly reflects increased physical heterogeneity produced by tributary-forced aggradation.…”
Section: Tributary-driven Aggradation In River Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are other reasons why confluences are important for river biodiversity including: provision of nutrient or prey subsidies (Wipfli and Gregovitch, 2002;Fernandes et al, 2004;Wellard-Kelly, 2013); the presence of unique confluence-zone habitats (Nakamoto, 1994;Franks et al, 2002;Kreb and Budiono, 2005); the amplification of competition amongst species (Besemer et al, 2013); and bi-directional filtering that affects organism dispersal (e.g. Thornbrugh and Gido, 2010;Wilson and McTammany, 2014;Czeglédi et al, 2015). Confluences may therefore be biodiversity hotspots in river networks (Benda et al, 2004b), where added biological value partly reflects increased physical heterogeneity produced by tributary-forced aggradation.…”
Section: Tributary-driven Aggradation In River Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influences of downstream spatial factors on fish assemblages were illustrated in other river systems. In general, fish species richness declines with increasing distance to larger stream confluences of tributaries (Hitt & Angermeier, 2008), distance to stream mouth (Mullen et al, 2011) or a mainstem river (Pinto et al, 2009;Thornbrugh & Gido, 2010), and distance to ocean (Mercado-Silva et al, 2012), forward selection procedure were selected. The first and second axes accounted for 30.1 and 9.3% for the variation of species data, respectively.…”
Section: Determinants Of Fish Assemblagesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Species richness has been found to be higher in tributaries that converge into large rivers (Osborne and Wiley 1992;Fausch et al 1984;Thornbrugh and Gido 2010). Numerous riverine species have been found to overwinter in backwaters where temperatures are less extreme (Raibley et al 1997;Dettmers et al 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%