The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10641-013-0120-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Habitat associations of fish assemblages in the Cache River, Illinois

Abstract: Abstract:Fish and habitat were sampled by state agencies at 48 stations throughout the Cache River watershed, Illinois between 1992 and 2009. Two distinct fish assemblages were identified, one primarily found in the lower mainstem Cache River and a second found throughout tributaries and the upper mainstem Cache River. Using a canonical correspondence analysis, the distribution of fish species was largely explained by substrate, land use, drainage area and local habitat features. Creek chub, central stonerolle… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Small-scale variables important to structuring fish communities are often unavailable at the scale of this study. For example, coarse substrates have been associated with the occurrence of freckled madtom (Bouska & Whitledge, 2014) and in-stream vegetation is often associated with presence of plains topminnow (Fischer & Paukert, 2008b). In general, there appears to be a need for additional study of environmental requirements of warm water, non-game species in order to validate response curves.…”
Section: Model Development and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Small-scale variables important to structuring fish communities are often unavailable at the scale of this study. For example, coarse substrates have been associated with the occurrence of freckled madtom (Bouska & Whitledge, 2014) and in-stream vegetation is often associated with presence of plains topminnow (Fischer & Paukert, 2008b). In general, there appears to be a need for additional study of environmental requirements of warm water, non-game species in order to validate response curves.…”
Section: Model Development and Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These elements collectivity represents the land cover cascade (LCC), a framework used to quantify the transfer of land-cover-disturbance effects to stream biota such as fishes or aquatic invertebrates (Burcher et al 2007). These landscape alterations have been implicated in the altered distributions of aquatic biota across a range of spatiotemporal scales (Cooper et al 2013;Bouska & Whitledge 2014). However, assigning cause to individual landscape alterations is challenging for a number of reasons, including covariation among natural and anthropogenic gradients, multiple mechanisms of change operating simultaneously and in nonlinear fashions, and uncertainty in separating historical and contemporary influences (Allan 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%