1975
DOI: 10.1136/jech.29.2.116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of some social and environmental factors on the nutrient intake and nutritional status of schoolchildren.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
24
0
2

Year Published

1977
1977
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Two previous studies have found that a higher number of siblings was associated with lower average daily intake of total protein, animal protein, calcium, vitamins, and fat; but a higher consumption of carbohydrate and added sugar [9, 19]. The finding that individuals with siblings had a lower intake of all nutrients except carbohydrate and added sugar indicates that they have diets that rely on cheaper nutrients as sources of energy rather than more expensive diets including proteins and fats [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two previous studies have found that a higher number of siblings was associated with lower average daily intake of total protein, animal protein, calcium, vitamins, and fat; but a higher consumption of carbohydrate and added sugar [9, 19]. The finding that individuals with siblings had a lower intake of all nutrients except carbohydrate and added sugar indicates that they have diets that rely on cheaper nutrients as sources of energy rather than more expensive diets including proteins and fats [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of these studies found that individuals with no siblings had a higher daily intakes of nutrients (except carbohydrate and added sugars) compared to individuals with siblings, suggesting that only-children may have a better diet quality [9]. Other studies found that having more than one sibling is associated with higher nutritional risk (according to nutrients intake based on Reference Nutrient Intake) [10], and that additional siblings may decrease the availability of food for each child [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The association of first-born status and adulthood overweight was studied previously in European and African populations, with contradictory results (22,(34)(35)(36)(37). Patterson et al (27) observed that the risk of obesity in 10-y-old US girls decreased as the number of siblings increased, but the effect of first-born status was not assessed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 More recently, a fourth possibility, a genetic defect in adrenergic receptors, has been described. 14 Studies of both children and adults have demonstrated that individuals who consume low carbohydrate 15 or high fat diets, 16 regardless of the overall level of energy intake, have higher body weights. Several investigators have found that carbohydrate intake can promote obesity without excessive energy intake 17 while others have found a negative relationship between carbohydrate intake and obesity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%