SummaryBackground-Carbamazepine is widely accepted as a drug of first choice for patients with partial onset seizures. Several newer drugs possess efficacy against these seizure types but previous randomised controlled trials have failed to inform a choice between these drugs. We aimed to assess efficacy with regards to longer-term outcomes, quality of life, and health economic outcomes.

No abstract

SummaryBackground-Valproate is widely accepted as a drug of first choice for patients with generalised onset seizures, and its broad spectrum of efficacy means it is recommended for patients with seizures that are difficult to classify. Lamotrigine and topiramate are also thought to possess broad spectrum activity. The SANAD study aimed to compare the longer-term effects of these drugs in patients with generalised onset seizures or seizures that are difficult to classify.

Summary: Purpose:To study the impact of epilepsy and its treatment on people with epilepsy in Europe. We therefore aimed to collect data from as many countries as possible.Methods: Clinical and demographic details and information. about psychosocial functioning was collected using selfcompleted questionnaires mailed to members of epilepsy support groups.Results: Quality of life data was collected from >5,000 patients living in 15 countries in Europe. Over a third of all respondents had frequent seizures, and a fifth believed that their seizures were not well enough controlled by antiepileptic medication. Reported levels of side effects from medication were high. A significant number of respondents reported changing their medication because of side effects or poor control. Respondents reported that epilepsy and its treatment had a significant impact on a number of different aspects of their daily lives. Half of all respondents felt stigmatised by their epilepsy. There were significant differences by seizure type and frequency in the way respondents scored on measures of the perceived impact of their condition, the stigma associated with it and their health status as measured by a generic scale, the SF36.Conclusions: This study confirms the findings of previous smaller-scale studies that reducing side effects and achieving better control of seizures are key to improving the quality of life of people with epilepsy, as is reducing the stigma and handicap associated with it. Key Words: Epilepsy-Quality of life-European-Psychosocial-Adverse drug effects.Epilepsy, like many other chronic conditions, is characterized by uncertainty. Its severity and prognosis are variable, and seizures, its outward manifestation, are unpredictable. Some chronic conditions are also stigmatizing; and epilepsy, for reasons rooted deep in its history, is a stigmatizing condition par excellence. Because of its clinical uncertainty and its social meaning, the impact of epilepsy on a person's quality of life (QOL) can be significant.Earlier studies have highlighted several areas of particular concern to people with epilepsy (14). People with epilepsy are prone to have poorer self-esteem and higher levels of anxiety and depression than people with epilepsy (5,6). diminish the quality of everyday life in this group (16). In the remaining 20-30% whose seizures are chronic and intractable, the outlook may be less optimistic (17). However, the work of the investigators cited herein (1, 6,123) clearly shows that the relationship between the severity of epilepsy and its impact on QOL is complex and may be mediated by a number of different factors, including patients' own perceptions of themselves, their condition, and its treatment.To date, no large-scale cross-cultural studies of QOL for people with epilepsy have been performed. We wished to collect information about QOL and the impact of treatment in persons living in 15 countries across Europe. We describe the QOL of our study respondents and compare groups of patients with epilepsy of differing s...

Changes to information and presentation resulted in efficient recruitment acceptable to patients and clinicians. Embedding this controversial trial within qualitative research improved recruitment. Such methods probably have wider applicability and may enable even the most difficult evaluative questions to be tackled.

As part of a large community-based study, we retrospectively examined the clinical course of epilepsy in an unselected population of people who had a recent history of seizures or were receiving antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). Clinical information was collected from medial records, and information about psychosocial functioning was obtained by means of postal questionnaires sent to identified subjects. The response rate to the postal questionnaire was 71%. There were some deficiencies in the recording of clinical data, which is not unusual since data were taken from records held by primary physicians rather than from hospital clinics. Nevertheless, findings regarding the clinical course of epilepsy corresponded to those of earlier studies. Fifty-seven percent of the sample had had at least a 2-year seizure-free period and 46% of subjects were currently in a remission of at least 2-year duration. There was a clear relationship between current seizure frequency and levels of anxiety and depression, perceived impact of epilepsy, perceived stigma, and marital and employment status. The relationship of seizure frequency and other clinical variables to psychosocial function was explored by multivariate analysis techniques. The amount of variation in scores on the various measures of function accounted for by the clinical variables was small. The most important predictor was current seizure activity, which was the first variable to enter the regression analyses for six of the eight measures of psychosocial function considered. Age at epilepsy onset also emerged as a significant predictor for depression, stigma, and marital status. In individuals with epilepsy in remission, there was little evidence that psychosocial functioning was associated with length of remission, a finding which may in part reflect the nature of this study population. The results indicate that there are several more important predictors of psychopathology and social dysfunction in epilepsy and suggest several implications for treatment interventions.

No abstract

Background and aims: Study of health related quality of life (HRQOL) and the factors responsible for its impairment in primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) has, to date, been limited. There is increasing need for a HRQOL questionnaire which is specific to PBC. The aim of this study was to develop, validate, and evaluate a patient based PBC specific HRQOL measure. Subjects and methods: A pool of potential questions was derived from thematic analysis of indepth interviews carried out with 30 PBC patients selected to represent demographically the PBC patient population as a whole. This pool was systematically reduced, pretested, and cross validated with other HRQOL measures in national surveys involving a total of 900 PBC patients, to produce a quality of life profile measure, the PBC-40, consisting of 40 questions distributed across six domains. The PBC-40 was then evaluated in a blinded comparison with other HRQOL measures in a further cohort of 40 PBC patients. Results: The six domains of PBC-40 relate to fatigue, emotional, social, and cognitive function, general symptoms, and itch. The highest mean domain score was seen for fatigue and the lowest for itch. The measure has been fully validated for use in PBC and shown to be scientifically sound. PBC patient satisfaction, measured in terms of the extent to which a questionnaire addresses the problems that they experience, was significantly higher for the PBC-40 than for other HRQOL measures. Conclusion: The PBC-40 is a short easy to complete measure which is acceptable to PBC patients and has significantly greater relevance to their problems than other frequently used HRQOL measures. Its scientific soundness, shown in extensive testing, makes it a valuable instrument for future use in clinical and research settings.