2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.06.073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of forest stands and root morphologies on hillslope stability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…laricio (Poir.) Maire can significantly contribute to soil slope stabilization and, providing that appropriate forest management practices are used, could also allow for recolonization by other late-successional trees and woody shrubs, further stabilizing the soil, considering that diverse tree root types greatly contribute to slope stability [65]. Knowledge of the behavior of root systems can be helpful for designing and using bioengineering techniques [16,56,66] and can be useful for mapping slope stability in wooded areas, particularly in Mediterranean environments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…laricio (Poir.) Maire can significantly contribute to soil slope stabilization and, providing that appropriate forest management practices are used, could also allow for recolonization by other late-successional trees and woody shrubs, further stabilizing the soil, considering that diverse tree root types greatly contribute to slope stability [65]. Knowledge of the behavior of root systems can be helpful for designing and using bioengineering techniques [16,56,66] and can be useful for mapping slope stability in wooded areas, particularly in Mediterranean environments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanism through which root-reinforced soil is related to concrete reinforcement mainly plays the role of shear stress and tensile strength effect. The effect of root reinforcement increases the cohesive strength of soil, decreases soil deformation, prevents the incidence of surface tension cracks, and can avoid slope failure initiated by triggering factors [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16]. The shear stress is developed in the soil and transferred to the ground as tensile resistance in the roots, which ensures mechanical reinforcement by the roots [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of plant roots on slope stability can be divided into hydrological and mechanical factors, which can be valuable to ensure slope stability [1,2,5,21,[25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37]. With regards to the hydrological effects, plants intercept rainfall allowing it to slowly infiltrate into the soil by reducing the runoff velocity and, thus, reduces soil erosion [7,8,38]. Additionally, vegetation can reduce soil moisture by means of transpiration, which increase the matrix suction of the soil, resulting in an increase in the soil shear strength [7,14,37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genet et al (2010) reported that stand diversity does not primarily affect slope stability, however, rather the tree position on the slope and the architecture of the respective root system that crosses the potential slip surface (also suggested by results of Danjon et al 2008). The model outputs indicate that the r.slope.stability is able to Implications for model parameterisation Temgoua et al (2016) recently used a partly comparable approach, where root system morphologies were approximated by geometric solids and implemented in a finite element environment. Referring to these findings, we hypothesise that the application of paraboloids depict a further step in representing root system morphologies in 2.5D and 3D slip surface models.…”
Section: Separated Vs Mixed Standsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thomas and Pollen-Bankhead 2010;Schwarz et al 2010), 3D finite element models (e.g. Dupuy et al 2007;Temgoua et al 2016) or within a infinite slope environment (e.g. Bischetti et al 2005;Danjon et al 2008;Bischetti et al 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%