2022
DOI: 10.3390/met12010083
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of Dwell Time and Pressure on SPS Process with Titanium Aluminides

Abstract: Spark plasma sintering (SPS) or the field-assisted sintering technique (FAST) is commonly used to process powders that are difficult to consolidate, more efficiently than in the conventional powder metallurgy process route. During the process, holding time and applied holding pressure influence the product’s microstructure and subsequently its properties. In this study, in addition to the temperature impact, the influence of pressure and dwell time on the consolidation behaviour of titanium aluminide (TiAl) po… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(21 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the study, two variable parameters were selected to determine the optimal sintering conditions of the SPS process: temperature and dwell time. The research conducted on other materials [ 59 ] showed that the optimal set of usable parameters can also be obtained by changing the third important parameter of the SPS process, namely the applied pressure. In [ 59 ], the authors demonstrated that, with a lower temperature and, at the same time, a higher holding pressure and dwell time, a satisfactory result can be achieved as with a higher temperature and a lower pressure and dwell time (i.e., a similar result can be achieved with different SPS parameters).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the study, two variable parameters were selected to determine the optimal sintering conditions of the SPS process: temperature and dwell time. The research conducted on other materials [ 59 ] showed that the optimal set of usable parameters can also be obtained by changing the third important parameter of the SPS process, namely the applied pressure. In [ 59 ], the authors demonstrated that, with a lower temperature and, at the same time, a higher holding pressure and dwell time, a satisfactory result can be achieved as with a higher temperature and a lower pressure and dwell time (i.e., a similar result can be achieved with different SPS parameters).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The research conducted on other materials [ 59 ] showed that the optimal set of usable parameters can also be obtained by changing the third important parameter of the SPS process, namely the applied pressure. In [ 59 ], the authors demonstrated that, with a lower temperature and, at the same time, a higher holding pressure and dwell time, a satisfactory result can be achieved as with a higher temperature and a lower pressure and dwell time (i.e., a similar result can be achieved with different SPS parameters). However, it was not confirmed that there is an optimal combination of parameters which would be suitable for different types of sintered material.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sintering curves of the samples milled for 13, 20, and 70 h are presented in Figure 1a-c, respectively. The punch displacement curve reflects the densification process of the powder, as well as its stabilization after reaching the sintering temperature [50].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The experimental setup is shown in Figure 1. Before the start of each test, all contact points between tool and powder were coated with graphite spray to enable ejection after pressing [14]. To ensure best possible comparability, all samples produced should have the same dimensions, 20 mm in diameter and height at 100% compaction.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%