2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2015.05.057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of chitosan and its derivatives on cell development and physiology of Ustilago maydis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(35 reference statements)
3
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Microscopy observations showed that both conidia and mycelium of P. expansum were severely damaged by chitosan treatment. Similar effects were reported for F. oxysporum (Palma-Guerrero et al 2008) and Ustilago maydis (Dlicón-Hernández et al 2015). The antifungal activity of chitosan might be attributed to its structural capability to bind to the negatively charged components presented on fungal cell surface via electrostatic interactions, which resulted in membrane leakage (Xing et al, 2015).…”
Section: Morphological Changes In Response To Chitosansupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Microscopy observations showed that both conidia and mycelium of P. expansum were severely damaged by chitosan treatment. Similar effects were reported for F. oxysporum (Palma-Guerrero et al 2008) and Ustilago maydis (Dlicón-Hernández et al 2015). The antifungal activity of chitosan might be attributed to its structural capability to bind to the negatively charged components presented on fungal cell surface via electrostatic interactions, which resulted in membrane leakage (Xing et al, 2015).…”
Section: Morphological Changes In Response To Chitosansupporting
confidence: 68%
“…On addition to its potential to elicit plant defense by increasing the production of defense-related secondary metabolites and promoting the expression of defense-related enzymes (Hadwiger, 2013), chitosan also exhibits direct antimicrobial activities against plant pathogens (Xing et al, 2015). A number of researches have revealed that the antimicrobial mechanisms of chitosan can be partially explained by electrostatic interaction between the protonated amino group (-HN 3 + ) on chitosan chain and the negatively charged components at the microbial surfaces, thereby increasing the plasma membrane permeability and causing the death of microorganisms (Garcia-Rincon et al, 2010;Dlicón-Hernández et al, 2015). Furthermore, chitosan is presumed to be able to cross microbial cell membrane, destroy intracellular components, disrupt the normal physiological processes, or directly bind to genetic materials, interfere with DNA replication and ultimately resulting in the death of pathogens (Palma-Guerrero et al, 2009;Xing et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The antimicrobial activity of CHI is well known against bacteria and fungi (Senel and McClure, 2004), and have been used as rumen modulator. Chitosan was able to completely inhibit the growth of dimorphic fungus (Olicón-Hernández et al, 2015). Araújo et al (2015) reported that CHI quadratically affected the ruminal ammonia nitrogen concentration and the molar proportions of propionate in beef steers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, no inflammatory reaction or tissue injury was observed when the concentration of COS was as high as 5% [90]. The development of Ustilago maydis could also be inhibited by COS [91]. COS was reported to prolong the shelf-life of beer because of its good inhibitory effect on beer-spoilage bacteria where COS with the molecular weight of around 2 kDa exhibited optimal effects [92].…”
Section: Biological Functions Of Cosmentioning
confidence: 99%