2011 12th European Conference on Radiation and Its Effects on Components and Systems 2011
DOI: 10.1109/radecs.2011.6131365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence of beam conditions and energy for SEE testing

Abstract: The effects of heavy-ion test conditions and beam energy on device response are investigated. These effects are illustrated with two types of test vehicles; SRAMs and power MOSFETs. In addition, GEANT4 simulations have also been performed to better understand the results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
11
0
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
4
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The epitaxial layer is highlighted in the figure by vertical dashed lines and it extends from 5 µm until 18 µm from the die surface. This confirms that the energy deposition is well defined within the active layer and the ions penetrate deep enough in the device structure to meet the worst-case energy deposition criterion as discussed in [20]. The main source of uncertainty is due to the fluence measurement and, in general, for the RADEF facility an error of +10% is considered.…”
Section: B Heavy Ion Irradiation Testssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The epitaxial layer is highlighted in the figure by vertical dashed lines and it extends from 5 µm until 18 µm from the die surface. This confirms that the energy deposition is well defined within the active layer and the ions penetrate deep enough in the device structure to meet the worst-case energy deposition criterion as discussed in [20]. The main source of uncertainty is due to the fluence measurement and, in general, for the RADEF facility an error of +10% is considered.…”
Section: B Heavy Ion Irradiation Testssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…3, the LET distribution of the secondaries is very similar to that produced by 200-MeV protons in silicon, the main difference between the two arising near the LET of the projectile and lower values, which therefore account for most of the nuclear reaction cross section difference. Therefore, a component with an LET threshold above that of the primary beam is expected to have a similar SEE cross section to that associated with HE protons, in agreement to what was observed experimentally and through simulation in [8] and [31]. Thus, it can be concluded that reactions in the VHE and UHE regimes have cross sections that only weakly depend on the ion mass and are therefore comparable to those associated with protons and neutrons.…”
Section: B Nuclear Reaction Impact On Indirect Energy-deposition Seessupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Moreover, even if the SV is reached, in order for the SEE results as a function of LET to be meaningful, the range needs to be sufficient to cover the full SV thickness with a roughly constant LET value. As has been shown in the past, ions with similar LETs but different ranges can lead to very different SEE responses [8] due to insufficient beam penetration. Therefore, testing at larger ion energies can be beneficial both in terms of not requiring part opening and testing in a vacuum, as well as for guaranteeing a constant LET throughout the entire sensitive thickness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…As is observed for 12 C on silicon and copper, the Z values of the fusion products largely depend on the projectile and target mass, and can reach values of the sum of their individual Z. Similar simulated results were shown in [30] for a 124 Xe 46 MeV/n beam on silicon. Fig.…”
Section: A Calculations At a Production Levelsupporting
confidence: 80%