2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10260-010-0135-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Influence diagnostics in the tobit censored response model

Abstract: Cook distance, Likelihood methods, Local influence, Residual analysis,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
24
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well known that the validity of the Tobit estimator depends on the assumption of normality (Barros, Galea, Gonzalez and Leiva 2010). Several potential misspecifications in the form of heteroskedasticity and incorrect normal assumption imply inconsistency for the Tobit estimation (Brannas and Laitila 1989).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that the validity of the Tobit estimator depends on the assumption of normality (Barros, Galea, Gonzalez and Leiva 2010). Several potential misspecifications in the form of heteroskedasticity and incorrect normal assumption imply inconsistency for the Tobit estimation (Brannas and Laitila 1989).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. , n, we obtain the Tobit censored response model studied by Barros et al (2010). In addition, if U i ∼ Gamma(ν/2, ν/2) we obtain the Student-t censored regression model developed by Massuia et al (2014).…”
Section: The Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to identify atypical observations and/or model misspecification, we analyzed the transformation of the martingale residual, r MT i , proposed by Barros et al (2010). These residuals are defined by…”
Section: Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The local influence method is employed in several areas of applied econometrics and statistics. For example, there are a number of applications and studies in regression modelling and time series analysis; see Cook (1986), Galea et al (1997), Liu (2000Liu ( , 2002Liu ( , 2004, Díaz-García et al (2003), Galea et al (2008) and Shi and Chen (2008) for studies in linear regression and time series models, de Castro et al (2007) and Galea and de Castro (2012) for heteroskedastic errors-in-variables models, Leiva et al (2007Leiva et al ( , 2014 for influence diagnostics with censored and uncensored data, Barros et al (2010) for a Tobit model and Paula et al (2012) for robust modelling applied to insurance data. In particular, the local influence method can play an important role in regression models involving restrictions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%