2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2015.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inferring other people's states of mind: Comparison across social anxiety, body dysmorphic, and obsessive–compulsive disorders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
55
5
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
4
55
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, many tasks focus on a specific aspect of social cognition (e.g., the ability to identify emotions from either facial expression or vocal or narrative information), whereas in real life individuals need to integrate all these different modalities (e.g., facial, bodily, paralinguistic, auditory and contextual cues) to make sense of others and to function in a socially appropriate way. Only one study used such a multimodal task in OCD patients (74). Interestingly, this study showed no differences in performance between patients and healthy controls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, many tasks focus on a specific aspect of social cognition (e.g., the ability to identify emotions from either facial expression or vocal or narrative information), whereas in real life individuals need to integrate all these different modalities (e.g., facial, bodily, paralinguistic, auditory and contextual cues) to make sense of others and to function in a socially appropriate way. Only one study used such a multimodal task in OCD patients (74). Interestingly, this study showed no differences in performance between patients and healthy controls.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Some of these studies find deficits in both affective and cognitive ToM (73,80) whereas in other studies deficits are limited to (social-)cognitive and higher-order domains (76,79). Yet other studies, however, show no clear deficits (36,47,74,77,78). The observed ToM deficits seem to depend in part on more general cognitive abilities (73,79), which is unsurprising as ToM tasks draw upon general cognitive and verbal abilities to a much greater extent than lower-level processes such as emotion recognition [see, e.g., (91)].…”
Section: Section Summary and Discussion: Mentalizing/tommentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Another strength of this task is that it offers the opportunity to compute affective and cognitive scores by dissociating items related to these two ToM subcomponents. The MASC has been widely used in neurological and psychiatric populations, notably showing that ToM is preserved in obsessive‐compulsive disorders (Buhlmann et al., ) but is globally impaired in multiple sclerosis (Kraemer et al., ), borderline personality disorder (Ritter et al., ), and unipolar depression (Wolkenstein et al., ). Error analysis also allowed to go beyond the mere description of ToM impairment; for example, in schizophrenia positive correlations have been found between overmentalizing and positive symptoms (Fretland et al., ), and between undermentalizing and negative symptoms (Montag et al., ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the hallmark features of BDD is social avoidance, which results directly from concerns that others are negatively evaluating their appearance. People with BDD are less accurate in identifying others' thoughts and intentions in a video-based test for mind reading difficulties (Buhlmann, Wacker, & Dziobek, 2015). Individuals with BDD are less accurate in identifying facial expressions conveying a neutral or disgust expression (Buhlmann, McNally, Etcoff, Tuschen-Caffier, & Wilhelm, 2004), misidentify neutral expressions as conveying anger or contempt (Buhlmann, Etcoff, & Wilhelm, 2006), and attribute others' emotional expressions more often to themselves (internal attributions) than to the situation (external attributions) (Buhlmann et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Individuals with BDD are less accurate in identifying facial expressions conveying a neutral or disgust expression (Buhlmann, McNally, Etcoff, Tuschen-Caffier, & Wilhelm, 2004), misidentify neutral expressions as conveying anger or contempt (Buhlmann, Etcoff, & Wilhelm, 2006), and attribute others' emotional expressions more often to themselves (internal attributions) than to the situation (external attributions) (Buhlmann et al, 2006). People with BDD are less accurate in identifying others' thoughts and intentions in a video-based test for mind reading difficulties (Buhlmann, Wacker, & Dziobek, 2015). These biases in social cognition extend to interpretive biases for threat in social scenarios (Buhlmann et al, 2002;Clerkin & Teachman, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%