2014
DOI: 10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n20p2949
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Industrial Accident and Safety Hazards at the Workplace: A Spatio-Physical Workplace Approach

Abstract: The

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These hazards also constitute significant risk in work environment. These findings corroborated with results of similar studies [1,[6][7]12,[31][32].…”
Section: Identification Of Safety Hazards In the Chisupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These hazards also constitute significant risk in work environment. These findings corroborated with results of similar studies [1,[6][7]12,[31][32].…”
Section: Identification Of Safety Hazards In the Chisupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The surrounding work environment of any organization is made up of factors that directly or indirectly influence the behaviour of workers. It positively or negatively affects the safety of workers; however, the workplace environment is often overlooked in Nigeria [1]. The presence of hazards in any work environment is a potential source of danger with the likelihood of causing harm to workers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Furthermore, an adequate risk evaluation technique depends on a progression of stages, including recognizing dangers, appraising the degree of the threat, deciding the technique to adapt in decreasing the threat and accessing the effectiveness of the entire stages of risk assessment (Bankole & Ibrahim, 2012). The two kinds of risk assessment are quantitative and qualitative (Odeku, 2014). Quantitative evaluation is a direct risk evaluation based on data obtained from the workplace, while qualitative is based on the judgment of the efficacy of the risk.…”
Section: Risk Assessment Policymentioning
confidence: 99%