2018 International Conference on Digital Arts, Media and Technology (ICDAMT) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/icdamt.2018.8376534
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indoor localization distance error analysis with UWB wireless propagation model using positioning method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the whole, for all results, the average errors were (0.331) m based on the RSS method and (0.251) m based on ToA. From previous results, it can be noted that the estimated distance is close to a real distance for the distances less than (20) m and slightly increases in the distance more than (20) m, and the errors stay in the acceptable value up to (40) m. These results are compared with the research [32], where the researchers relied on static values. The results achieved in such reference reported that ToA is better than the RSS method and that errors have been identified (0.48-1.52) m. Also, the researcher of [33] used min/max positioning based on static values of both ToA and RSS measurements.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…On the whole, for all results, the average errors were (0.331) m based on the RSS method and (0.251) m based on ToA. From previous results, it can be noted that the estimated distance is close to a real distance for the distances less than (20) m and slightly increases in the distance more than (20) m, and the errors stay in the acceptable value up to (40) m. These results are compared with the research [32], where the researchers relied on static values. The results achieved in such reference reported that ToA is better than the RSS method and that errors have been identified (0.48-1.52) m. Also, the researcher of [33] used min/max positioning based on static values of both ToA and RSS measurements.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 51%
“…Such results confirm that dividing the case study area into more zones leads to more accuracy. These results are compared with the research [32], where the researchers relied on the results achieved in their research, it was reported that ToA is better than the RSS method and that errors have been identified (0.48-1.52) m.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This broad bandwidth also involves a high temporal resolution, enabling a higher accuracy, and hence more accurate positioning of each target device in the network [134]. The IEEE 802.15.4a (UWB) wireless communication technologies are quickly developing and they will be in the 5G technology [29]. UWB transmission is described by its capacity to communicate short pulses with low-power spectral density in a high-frequency range, from 3.1 to 10.6 GHz.…”
Section: Uwb Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Localization based on UWB concentrates on the trilateration and angulation methods [29,68,[138][139][140][141] on the unknown location of a target device using three or more beacon nodes. Range-based approaches such as TOA and TDOA have good accuracy and are most suited for localization and ranging for wireless networks because of the large bandwidth of UWB signals [57].…”
Section: Uwb Technologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation