2002
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20020734
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indirect effect of the triaxiality in the Hamiltonian theory for the rigid Earth nutations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…taken A 0 = B 0 since B 0 /A 0 − 1 10 −5 (e.g. Escapa et al 2002); kept only first order terms in the angle J , and denoted the moments of inertia A 0 and C 0 as A and C, respectively. These relations are the same as those reported in Kubo (1991Kubo ( , 2009.…”
Section: Hamiltonian Of the Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…taken A 0 = B 0 since B 0 /A 0 − 1 10 −5 (e.g. Escapa et al 2002); kept only first order terms in the angle J , and denoted the moments of inertia A 0 and C 0 as A and C, respectively. These relations are the same as those reported in Kubo (1991Kubo ( , 2009.…”
Section: Hamiltonian Of the Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, some works have improved the rotational model of the rigid Earth, establishing a truncation level in the nutation series of the figure axis of 0.1 micro-arcsecond (e.g. Souchay et al 1999 and references therein, Escapa et al 2002;Getino et al 2010). On the other hand, Kinoshita's method has been properly modified and extended to consider more realistic non-rigid Earth models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These values are 1 order of magnitude larger than the value that is used by Mathews and Bretagnon [] or Escapa et al . [] when they tried to estimate the influence of the core triaxiality on the prograde diurnal polar motion. Both of these two studies assumed that β f is around 1.0 × 10 −5 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…There are still many difficult open problems, such as magnetic effects (HUANG et al 2011), motions of inner layers (BARKIN and VILKE 2004), relativistic effects (KLIONER et al 2009), consistent and comprehensive treatment of a more realistic time-varying earth model, etc. Clearer separation of nutations and polar motion is also sought as we approach the EOP determination at a sub-diurnal rate (NILSSON et al 2010) and non-predictable constituents are accounted in the nutation angles like the free core nutation (FCN) (LAMBERT 2007;KRASNA et al 2013), whereas some short periodic predictable astronomical effects are included into PM ESCAPA et al 2002, BRZEZINSKI 2001.…”
Section: Present State Of the Earth Rotation Modelling And Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%