2014
DOI: 10.1007/s00024-014-0879-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Earth’s Rotation: A Challenging Problem in Mathematics and Physics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 79 publications
(44 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are hundreds, perhaps thousands, of papers, surveys, and proposed ideas discussing a very wide range of issues relating to Earth, astronomy, and IoT knowledge [39][40][41][42]. However, as we searched extensively for related works to ours, we found that no previous work discussed the computation of net force produced by actuators on Earth conceptually as described in this paper.…”
Section: State Of the Art Of Evaluation Methodologies In Iot Systemsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…There are hundreds, perhaps thousands, of papers, surveys, and proposed ideas discussing a very wide range of issues relating to Earth, astronomy, and IoT knowledge [39][40][41][42]. However, as we searched extensively for related works to ours, we found that no previous work discussed the computation of net force produced by actuators on Earth conceptually as described in this paper.…”
Section: State Of the Art Of Evaluation Methodologies In Iot Systemsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…For the sake of concreteness, the periodic part of the former first order solution will be obtained. From an astronomical point of view, this is related to the forced nutations of the Earth (see e.g., Ferrándiz et al 2015).…”
Section: Application Of the Modified Lie-hori Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us start by recalling the formulae for the Poisson and Oppolzer terms due to the zonal component (2, 0) of the direct lunisolar potential in the case of a rigid Earth. We employ the same notation used in Getino & Ferrándiz (1995) and Ferrándiz et al (2016), similar to the original notation used by Kinoshita (1977). For the sake of conciseness, our notation is not explained here in detail, since the main difference with respect to Kinoshita's one lies in the notation of the Andoyer variables as (λ, µ, ν, Λ, M, N) instead of (h, g, l, H, G, L), and the use of σ instead of J for the colatitude of the angular momentum axis.…”
Section: Computation Of Oppolzer Terms In the Planetary Nutationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, the Poisson terms raised by a perturbing body B p of Kinoshita's constant K p can be written (Getino & Ferrándiz 1995;Ferrándiz et al 2016) as…”
Section: Computation Of Oppolzer Terms In the Planetary Nutationsmentioning
confidence: 99%