2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2015.02.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indications for Treatment: Is Observation or Chemotherapy Alone a Reasonable Approach in the Management of Low-Grade Gliomas?

Abstract: The treatment of newly diagnosed low grade gliomas (LGG) remains controversial. Recently published results from the long-term follow up of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) trial 9802 demonstrated medically meaningful and statistically significant survival prolongation by adding chemotherapy with procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine (PCV) after radiotherapy vs. radiotherapy alone for “high” risk patients (median 13.3 vs. 7.8 years, HR 0.59, p=0.03). However, in the 17 years since that trial was launc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
(102 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…25,26 does not necessarily follow, as previously reported. [31][32][33][34] We conclude that evidence-based practice in the field of diffuse low-grade glioma cannot be derived from the standard methodology of randomized clinical trials. This is not surprising, considering the very long survival of patients with this disease and the numerous parameters (age, clinical, epileptic and cognitive status, patient's way of life, histology, molecular biology, radiological kinetics, extent of resection, response to each chemotherapy line and radiation sequence) that have to be integrated to update decision making all along the course of the management.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…25,26 does not necessarily follow, as previously reported. [31][32][33][34] We conclude that evidence-based practice in the field of diffuse low-grade glioma cannot be derived from the standard methodology of randomized clinical trials. This is not surprising, considering the very long survival of patients with this disease and the numerous parameters (age, clinical, epileptic and cognitive status, patient's way of life, histology, molecular biology, radiological kinetics, extent of resection, response to each chemotherapy line and radiation sequence) that have to be integrated to update decision making all along the course of the management.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Glioma is highly aggressive and is associated with a very poor prognosis, and the median survival rate is ~12–15 months ( 30 , 31 ). Even though the current clinical treatments for glioma have achieved satisfactory results, adjuvant chemotherapy after surgical resection and radiotherapy are still irreplaceable ( 32 34 ). This forms a rationale for the development of novel chemotherapeutic agents for the treatment of glioma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 9802 trial demonstrated a clear survival benefit of PCV following RT in patients with “high-risk” DLGG. 4 However, this result did not necessarily influence practice 10,11,16,25 as clinicians still largely propose TMZ to patients, in the absence of studies comparing both regimens and considering the ease of administration of TMZ and the toxicity of PCV.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%