2016
DOI: 10.1080/07370652.2016.1199610
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Indicating Inconsistency of Desensitizing High Explosives against Impact through Recrystallization at the Nanoscale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Higher reactivity stems from the enhanced reactivity of surface molecules compared to molecules within the bulk. 18,19 Concerning higher reactivity, Al nanoparticles are favorable when compared to their homologue micromaterial. 9,18 Surface modification through chemical functionalization obviously squeezes the PSD.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Higher reactivity stems from the enhanced reactivity of surface molecules compared to molecules within the bulk. 18,19 Concerning higher reactivity, Al nanoparticles are favorable when compared to their homologue micromaterial. 9,18 Surface modification through chemical functionalization obviously squeezes the PSD.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher reactivity stems from the enhanced reactivity of surface molecules compared to molecules within the bulk. , Concerning higher reactivity, Al nanoparticles are favorable when compared to their homologue micromaterial. , Surface modification through chemical functionalization obviously squeezes the PSD. For instance, x mean of pristine Al nanoparticles (170 nm) dispersed in ethanol decreases through surface functionalization to 120 nm with TODA and to 140 nm with TNP.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 , the minimum sensitivity to impact is confirmed when coating the powders with a binder; however, that confirmation might reveal that the trend is more due to the intrinsic bulk properties of the particles instead of their surface. Klaumünzer et al [ 7 ] investigated the sensitization of n-RDX against impact and strongly reaffirmed that the generalization of a direct link between smaller particle and lower impact sensitivity – as seen many times in the literature – should be more forcefully addressed.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Considerable efforts have been made worldwide on reducing the particle size of common explosives and a number of studies have found that submicron-and nano-explosives have much lower impact sensitivity when compared with conventional explosives [4][5][6][7][8][9]. However, some studies have presented opposing results, showing that reducing the particle size increases the impact sensitivity [10][11][12][13][14]. The uncertainty in the bulk density of loose powder samples used in the standard impact sensitivity test was assumed to account for this inconsistency [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%