Increasing the Use of Evaluation Through Participation: The experience of a rural sustainable development plan evaluation

Abstract

In recent decades, the use of evaluation has been one of the main concerns of both academics and practitioners, and there has been much controversy throughout the evaluation literature. Different perspectives of evaluation can determine the way evaluation findings are used and the contribution of evaluation to individual and organizational learning is conditioned by stakeholder participation. In this article, our main hypothesis is that stakeholder participation increases evaluation significance, ownership and utilization and, as a consequence, participatory evaluation approaches improve programme governance. We focus on the evaluation of the Rural Sustainable Development Plan in the Basque Country, a context that reveals a complex institutional network (at regional and local level) with a limited tradition of evaluation. To enhance the full scope of participatory evaluation, this article: (i) briefly reviews the theoretical discourse on evaluation utilization; (ii) describes the evaluation context (rural development policy and its governance); (iii) presents the evaluation model as applied to the mid‐term evaluation of the Basque Rural Sustainable Development Plan; and (iv) analyses the use of the evaluation findings and processes according to four dimensions, namely information generation, knowledge generation, orientated‐action utilization and orientated‐policy utilization. Finally, we provide guidance to improve knowledge about evaluation use, participation and good governance, which could be all considered as basic tools for solid institutionalization of sustainable development strategies. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment

Performance assessment of primary health care facilities in Brazil: Concordance between web-based questionnaire and in-person interviews with health personnel

“…Timely disclosure of results and good strategies for communicating them are mentioned in the literature [ 36 , 37 ] as factors that promote knowledge and use of the assessments to underpin political decision making, redesign measures, and allocate financial resources [ 38 , 39 ]. They also increase acceptance of the assessment, according to Rissi, Sager (2013) [ 40 ].…”

Measurement and Path Selection of Rural Development Level in Enclave Areas: A Case Study of Jingyuan County, Gansu Province

“…It necessitates evolution and restructuring focus on the association and interaction of development factors, industrial structure, and spatial functions (production, life, ecology and culture) in rural space, and integrating and diversifying resource factors, economic structure, and spatial functions in the rural regional system through spatial carrying [19,39]. As an important part of the rural development system, the resource elements combine the economic structure with the spatial function by means of the flow of the spatial elements and the structural optimization, and promote the internal transformation of rural development elements, structure, and function [3,33,59,60]. The elements of rural resources constitute the unique economic structure of rural areas, and the adjustment and optimization of economic structure determine the differences and particularities of rural functions.…”

Changes in the Organic Processing in Poland in the Years 2004-2017

“…Other authors emphasize the great importance of ecological production and quality of the natural environment in the implementation of sustainable rural development at regional and local level. The condition for implementing individual components of the sustainable development paradigm is the active participation of rural resi-dents and other people (Diez, Izquierdo and Malagon, 2016;Rotaru et al, 2017). It is subject to strict regulations on the basis of Community and national acts that are related to the organic farming and processing.…”