2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijepes.2019.03.069
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incorporate flexibility in distribution grid planning through a framework solution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A majority of the reviewed references focus exclusively on BESS as grid planning alternatives and only some [28,[37][38][39][40][41] explicitly consider both grid reinvestment and BESS alternatives. Often it is not explicitly described whether BESS is considered as a temporary solution to postpone grid reinvestments [38,42] or as a more permanent solution.…”
Section: B Investment Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A majority of the reviewed references focus exclusively on BESS as grid planning alternatives and only some [28,[37][38][39][40][41] explicitly consider both grid reinvestment and BESS alternatives. Often it is not explicitly described whether BESS is considered as a temporary solution to postpone grid reinvestments [38,42] or as a more permanent solution.…”
Section: B Investment Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to obtain the most cost-efficient planning solution, DSO has to compare different planning alternatives such as traditional reinforcement and using FSs from AEs. A comprehensive review of planning algorithms involving AEs could be found in [33].…”
Section: Cost Estimation Of Aesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can also result in need for expensive grid expansion measures [30]. Frameworks for distribution grid planning are introduced in [31,32]. The latter can be also used for large-scale networks, as shown in [33].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%