2021
DOI: 10.3390/su131810052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inclusion in Global Environmental Governance: Sustained Access, Engagement and Influence in Decisive Spaces

Abstract: With increased participation of non-state actors in global governance, the inclusion of vulnerable groups in making sustainability regulations remains a relevant challenge requiring more research. Based on an ethnographic study on creating the Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit-Sharing of biological resources and knowledge, we advance a new multi-dimensional view of inclusion that integrates sustained access, involvement, and influence in the intergovernmental negotiation meetings. We elaborate the concept … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 73 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the Primate Action Fund managed by the PSG and supporting organizations, the most recent being Re:wild, have placed major emphasis on supporting emerging conservationists from countries, such as Madagascar and other habitat countries for more than 40 years. Also relevant to this point are key lessons and recommendations summarized by O'Neill and O'Connor [50] in their review of great ape action plans, and there is extensive literature on the types of spaces (whether virtual or in-person) needed for inclusive decision-making (e.g., [63,64]). The efforts described above are, of course, only a start.…”
Section: The Planning Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the Primate Action Fund managed by the PSG and supporting organizations, the most recent being Re:wild, have placed major emphasis on supporting emerging conservationists from countries, such as Madagascar and other habitat countries for more than 40 years. Also relevant to this point are key lessons and recommendations summarized by O'Neill and O'Connor [50] in their review of great ape action plans, and there is extensive literature on the types of spaces (whether virtual or in-person) needed for inclusive decision-making (e.g., [63,64]). The efforts described above are, of course, only a start.…”
Section: The Planning Processmentioning
confidence: 99%