1933
DOI: 10.1103/physrev.44.240.2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inability of X-Rays to Decompose Water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1938
1938
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is probable that all substances of organic nature, and inorganic substances which are less inert than, for example, NaCl, will produce this effect. Some investigators of radiation effects on substances other than enzymes have made similar observations [Stenstrom & Lohmann, 1931;1933;Fricke & Brownscombe, 1933;Fricke & Washburn, 1932]. This inhibition of the radiation effect by the presence of other substances, i.e.…”
supporting
confidence: 50%
“…It is probable that all substances of organic nature, and inorganic substances which are less inert than, for example, NaCl, will produce this effect. Some investigators of radiation effects on substances other than enzymes have made similar observations [Stenstrom & Lohmann, 1931;1933;Fricke & Brownscombe, 1933;Fricke & Washburn, 1932]. This inhibition of the radiation effect by the presence of other substances, i.e.…”
supporting
confidence: 50%
“…Figure 3 shows that pure water irradiated by X-rays gives no continuous decomposition since the dosage curves rapidly approach zero slope; but the experimental conditions must be closely defined. In the experiments of Figure 3, completely filled and sealed irradiation cells were used and no appreciable hydrogen or oxygen appeared (11,17). In experiments containing a large gas phase, no peroxide was found in the liquid phase (18) although hydrogen was found in the gas phase (19).…”
Section: Wafer Purification and Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%