1942
DOI: 10.1042/bj0360080
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The effect of X-rays on the conjugated protein d-amino-acid oxidase

Abstract: In a previous paper [Dale, 1940] the effect of X-rays on crystalline carboxypeptidase and polyphenol oxidase was investigated mainly in regard to the radiosensitivity of these enzymes as a function of their concentration. One of the findings of this investigation was that enzymes are affected by reasonably small doses of X-radiation. Since their high chemical activity allows the measurement of radiation effects on them in concentrations as low as those in which they occur in living matter, they are well suite… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

1947
1947
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As early as the 1940s, there were reports that the inactivation of biological entities may be brought about equally by ionizations produced within the entity, or by the ionization of the surrounding medium (Dale, 1940(Dale, , 1942(Dale, , 1943Lea et al, 1944). Kotval and Gray (1947) had shown that a-particles which pass close to the chromatid thread, as well as those which pass through it, have a significant probability of producing chromatid and isochromatid breaks or chromatid exchanges.…”
Section: The Bystander Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As early as the 1940s, there were reports that the inactivation of biological entities may be brought about equally by ionizations produced within the entity, or by the ionization of the surrounding medium (Dale, 1940(Dale, , 1942(Dale, , 1943Lea et al, 1944). Kotval and Gray (1947) had shown that a-particles which pass close to the chromatid thread, as well as those which pass through it, have a significant probability of producing chromatid and isochromatid breaks or chromatid exchanges.…”
Section: The Bystander Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RAs could potentially counteract radiation effects from accidental or deliberate exposure hence they are also called radiation counter-measures [4] . The term of RA together with radioprotection was first introduced by Dale in 1942 during his studies on enzymes as indicative molecules [5] . Then in 1949, Patt and his co-workers were the first to investigate the radioprotective effect of amino-acid cysteine against lethal doses of X-rays according to the documented records [6,7] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the latter case, the inactivation is apparently due to reaction with the radiation products of water. The composition of the medium is of great importance here since the addition of other solutes will result in competition for these radiation products, effectively lowering the number available for reaction with the enzyme (24)(25)(26). The significance of this protective effect, although amply demonstrated in many studies, has not been sufficiently appreciated by many radiation experimenters, particularly with respect to the precautions that must be taken to avoid unintentional addition of substances other than the one being studied.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%