Improving Operational Planning and Management of National Parks in Turkey: A Case Study

Abstract

The purpose this study was to improve operational planning and management of national parks in Turkey to balance conservation use and sustainable management. Soguksu National Park (SNP) was chosen as the study area. The data were obtained from interviews of 182 visitor groups (in total, 819 people) and analyzed using correlation, factor, discriminant, and regression analyses. It was found that the most important factors affecting operational planning and management of SNP are (1) travel cost, (2) visitor welfare level, (3) intensity of use, (4) size of visitor group, (5) type of recreational demand. The main source of visitors to SNP is from a zone within a 0-90-km radius. This region comprised 53.85% of total visitors to the park. The capital of Turkey (Ankara) is the most important source of visitors from within this zone. The optimum activity mix in SNP is also determined. Picnicking, viewing the scenery, and nature walks or trekking comprised the main uses of the park. It is anticipated that these findings will help to improve operational planning and sustainable management of the national park and the environment.

Factors affecting rural development in turkey: Bartın case study

“…The rotated component matrix is given in Table 3 and the derived factors are named and interpreted based on the factor loadings in the rotated component matrix. In order to clearly see the variable groups, the dominating factors (with absolute factor loadings larger than 0.5) that determine the 12 factors are shown in bold in Table 3 (Harman, 1967;Bennet and Bowers, 1977;Mucuk, 1978;Daşdemir, 1996Daşdemir, , 2005. Four of the 36 variables do not have dominating factor loadings, namely SLOPE, RAIN, ROAD and OVA, their largest factor loading is added respectively to factors 1, 3, 9 and 12 and this is indicated in italic format.…”

Visitors' satisfaction, perceptions and gap analysis: The case of Dadia–Lefkimi–Souflion National Park

“…Therefore, their integrated management must necessarily also involve the proper handling of any potential problems, as well as the prospects, created by their characterization as a visitor attraction. At the same time, the views and preferences of visitors have begun to play a major role as regards the decisions made by national park managers (Kassioumis, 1995;Cessford and Muhar, 2003;Cole and Daniel, 2003;Vistad, 2003;Dasdemir, 2005;Papageorgiou and Kassioumis, 2005;Sterl et al, 2008).…”

Baseline of the spatial and temporal metal contamination in Dilek National Park, Turkey

“…In Turkey, the Ministry of Environment and Forestry manages 33 national parks which are used to provide a preserved habitat for endangered species (Dasdemir 2005). Turkey is currently the home to 1,701 rare plants, 2,931 mammals, and one fish species (Gulcu and Karahan 2004).…”