Improving news media oversight: Why Australia needs a cross-platform standards scheme

Abstract

Australia currently has fourteen standards schemes that oversee journalists and news media, making for both duplication and inconsistency. The result is a torn and frayed patchwork leaving broadcasting heavily regulated but some areas of online content without any applicable standards or clear avenues for consumer complaint. In this article, we describe Australia’s confusion of news media standards schemes amid the global challenges to media oversight in a digital age, including from the algorithmically driven delivery of news via social media and other digital services. We argue that internationally the ongoing disruption of news media is being accompanied by a parallel disruption of news media standards schemes. This creates significant uncertainty, particularly since citizens and journalists have contrasting expectations about news media oversight. However, this uncertainty also presents an opportunity for reform. We then draw on international scholarship and regulatory developments to make four high-level arguments. First, Australia should implement a coherent cross-platform standards scheme to cover news content on TV, on radio, in print and online. Second, digital services and platforms ought to be brought under this scheme in their role as distributors and amplifiers of news, but not as ‘publishers’. Third, this scheme ought to have oversight of algorithms. And fourth, citizens ought to be afforded a greater role in the operation of this scheme, which has significant potential to serve the public interest by improving public discourse.

Towards A Scientific Methodology for Arab Investigative Journalism: An in-depth Analysis of Interviews with Ten Arab Journalists

“…Technically, the investigative reporting is a long-term journalistic work (Houston, 2010& Thomas, 2013) that involves several steps and multiple aspects that differ from one media school to another (Wilding, et al, 2018). However, there are a number of milestones that many journalism schools agree upon as fixed steps to be followed by investigative journalists in order to conduct a high-quality media investigation (Fleeson, 2012).…”

Mindful mindfulness reporting: Media portrayals of scientific evidence for meditation mobile apps

“…With the media being the primary source of people’s information on science, medicine and health, evidence-based journalism is critical (Caulfield and Fahy, 2016). However, the changing landscape of contemporary journalism is placing pressure on an evidence-led approach to reporting (Wilding et al, 2018). Digital platforms have enabled a relentless 24-hour news cycle and the proliferation of social media (Wilding et al, 2018).…”

“…However, the changing landscape of contemporary journalism is placing pressure on an evidence-led approach to reporting (Wilding et al, 2018). Digital platforms have enabled a relentless 24-hour news cycle and the proliferation of social media (Wilding et al, 2018). This has led to heightened demand and competition, and the restructuring of traditional media and reduction of specialist reporters to cut costs (Leask et al, 2010; Wilding et al, 2018).…”

“…Digital platforms have enabled a relentless 24-hour news cycle and the proliferation of social media (Wilding et al, 2018). This has led to heightened demand and competition, and the restructuring of traditional media and reduction of specialist reporters to cut costs (Leask et al, 2010; Wilding et al, 2018). These changes threaten journalistic quality, including the depth and accuracy of science reporting (Barel-Ben David et al, 2020).…”