2014
DOI: 10.1002/bse.1842
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving Firm Environmental Performance and Reputation: The Role of Employee Green Teams

Abstract: This paper examines the link between a firm's organization environmental management capability, represented by the development of green teams made up of employees, and its performance. In particular, two categories of firm performance will be analysed: environmental performance and environmental reputation.This link has been investigated in a sample made of the largest publicly traded US companies. Data about green teams have been collected through the content analysis of firm environmental/sustainability/corp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
107
1
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(122 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
5
107
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the human/organizational aspects relevant to environmental management, the following were used in this study: environmental training, to provide the capacity to address environmental management situations (Jabbour, 2013); green empowerment, providing employees with the autonomy to make environmental decisions (Daily et al, 2012;Ramus, 1997); environmental performance evaluation, which measures employee contributions to the advancement of environmental performance (Jackson et al, in press); reward systems for environmental performance, which value employees who contribute the most to environmental sustainability (Renwick et al, 2013); support from top management for environmental initiatives (Daily and Huang, 2001); and inter/cross-functional integration of environmental management favoring the formation of green teams (Dangelico, 2014;Jabbour et al, 2013). Each of these items was measured using a 5-point Likert scale ranging between 1 (no adoption) and 5 (total adoption).…”
Section: Measurement Of Hoamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the human/organizational aspects relevant to environmental management, the following were used in this study: environmental training, to provide the capacity to address environmental management situations (Jabbour, 2013); green empowerment, providing employees with the autonomy to make environmental decisions (Daily et al, 2012;Ramus, 1997); environmental performance evaluation, which measures employee contributions to the advancement of environmental performance (Jackson et al, in press); reward systems for environmental performance, which value employees who contribute the most to environmental sustainability (Renwick et al, 2013); support from top management for environmental initiatives (Daily and Huang, 2001); and inter/cross-functional integration of environmental management favoring the formation of green teams (Dangelico, 2014;Jabbour et al, 2013). Each of these items was measured using a 5-point Likert scale ranging between 1 (no adoption) and 5 (total adoption).…”
Section: Measurement Of Hoamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This style allows subordinates more opportunities to “think outside of the box” instead of relying on traditional methods of solving problems. Prior research demonstrates that employees can contribute creative ideas for implementing environmental management and enhancing green innovation (Dangelico, ; Wolf, ). Given this, low power distance cultures may benefit more from the effect of EMPs on firm performance.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, firms in countries with high power distance cultures tend to adopt autocratic leadership characterized by subordinates' strong dependence on their superiors (Hofstede, ). Pursuing green innovation for these firms is more challenging and usually requires a change to their existing operational systems (Huang & Li, ; Zhang & Zhu, ), which calls for greater cross‐functional integration to implement EMPs effectively (Aragón‐Correa & Sharma, ; Dangelico, ; Melander, ). Considerable time is needed to integrate different functional perspectives, and conflicts are often unavoidable due to differences in the perspectives of those responsible for various functions (Song & Xie, ; Tsai & Hsu, ).…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unless an organization finds most of its members ready, it may be hesitant to implement GIS despite the potential to improve environmental performance and green image [3] [16]. Thus, there is likely a partial mediation between GIS strategy and GIS effort through GIS belief.…”
Section: Mediating Role Of Gis Beliefmentioning
confidence: 99%