Deeper Learning, Dialogic Learning, and Critical Thinking 2019
DOI: 10.4324/9780429323058-12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improving College Students' Critical Thinking through the use of a Story Tool for Self-Regulated Learning Training

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
5

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Grounded on present data, we believe that motivational-related factors are key in the promotion of healthy eating, but also that their impact on children’s food consumption is lower than expected. Therefore, the design of future research and interventions might consider: (a) promoting SR toward healthy eating (e.g., hands-on activities about meal planning) [ 23 , 36 , 43 ]; (b) boosting feelings of self-efficacy toward healthy eating (e.g., group interventions where children discuss their experiences in making (un)healthy choices with their peers, reinforcing the feasibility of success) [ 44 ]; (c) promoting positive attitudes toward healthy eating (e.g., illustrating that increasing fruit and vegetable consumption is important not only to maintain a healthy weight, but also to protect against chronic diseases) [ 45 ]; (d) improving the explained variance of food consumption by considering the inclusion of social-related variables in the path model (e.g., peer pressure on food consumption [ 46 ]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grounded on present data, we believe that motivational-related factors are key in the promotion of healthy eating, but also that their impact on children’s food consumption is lower than expected. Therefore, the design of future research and interventions might consider: (a) promoting SR toward healthy eating (e.g., hands-on activities about meal planning) [ 23 , 36 , 43 ]; (b) boosting feelings of self-efficacy toward healthy eating (e.g., group interventions where children discuss their experiences in making (un)healthy choices with their peers, reinforcing the feasibility of success) [ 44 ]; (c) promoting positive attitudes toward healthy eating (e.g., illustrating that increasing fruit and vegetable consumption is important not only to maintain a healthy weight, but also to protect against chronic diseases) [ 45 ]; (d) improving the explained variance of food consumption by considering the inclusion of social-related variables in the path model (e.g., peer pressure on food consumption [ 46 ]).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Children who SR their behavior proficiently, assume control and responsibility over their thoughts, emotions, and behaviors to achieve their self-set goals [ 18 ]. The narrative used in this intervention is grounded on the PLEE model, Planning, Execution, and Evaluation [ 36 , 37 ]. Rosario et.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The program was anchored in the social cognitive framework [18], particularly grounded in Zimmerman's SRL Model [19,20]. This model supported the PLEE (Planning, Execution, and Evaluation) model, as follows [21]: (a) the planning phase describes students' efforts to define their learning goals and select the learning strategies best suited to help them attain their goals; (b) the execution phase is displayed when students implement and monitor the execution of the plan established in the previous; and finally, (c) the evaluation phase occurs when students analyze the outcomes of the execution phase against the initial plan. In particular, by training and developing SRL competencies, students are encouraged to assume an agential role in their learning process, i.e., to take responsibility and control over their educational paths.…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%