2017
DOI: 10.1109/tie.2016.2632058
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement of Post-Fault Performance of a Cascaded H-bridge Multilevel Inverter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reliability of the inverter is one of the important factors for the stable operation of the photovoltaic system [1]. Multilevel converter has the advantages of less harmonic content of output voltage, lower switching loss, and lower stress, and it is considered to be the best choice for medium-high voltage and high power occasions [2]. One of the viable topologies is the 24-switch five-level NPC inverter [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reliability of the inverter is one of the important factors for the stable operation of the photovoltaic system [1]. Multilevel converter has the advantages of less harmonic content of output voltage, lower switching loss, and lower stress, and it is considered to be the best choice for medium-high voltage and high power occasions [2]. One of the viable topologies is the 24-switch five-level NPC inverter [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to develop FPSC with other modulation techniques, two methods based on space vector modulation and selective harmonic elimination (SHE) techniques have been proposed in [20, 21]. Modified FPSC solutions have been suggested in [22–24] for post‐fault operation of CHB in photovoltaic power plants and variable‐speed induction motor drives.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent topologies of MLIs have been explored with an objective of fault tolerance capability [13][14][15]. Various solutions have been presented for FT operation [11,[16][17][18][19][20][21][22]. As per the type of hardware redundancy, these solutions are generally categorised into four cases [16]: (a) switch level, (b) leg level, (c) module level, and (d) system level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%