2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0020-7403(99)00047-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improvement of formability for the incremental sheet metal forming process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
68
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 214 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
68
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A double-pass forming method was proposed by Kim and Yang [24] to improve the formability of aluminium sheets in ISF. It was shown that the majority of deformation occurs by shear, which is an important factor to improve the formability.…”
Section: Formability In Spifmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A double-pass forming method was proposed by Kim and Yang [24] to improve the formability of aluminium sheets in ISF. It was shown that the majority of deformation occurs by shear, which is an important factor to improve the formability.…”
Section: Formability In Spifmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The shear-based modeling for deformation pass design in ISF was first proposed in Kim et al (2000). However, this model is only suitable for double-pass deformation design.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the proper allocation of materials during forming is important to uniformly distribute the material thickness on the final parts in order to avoid the occurrence of forming failure. Kim et al (2000) proposed a double-pass forming method to improve the formability for the ISF process. This method is based on shear deformation using the predicted thickness strain distribution to design intermediate shapes in order to get a uniform thickness distribution of a final part.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The largest design draw angle Φ in the part must be less than Φ max which can be considered as a material parameter limit [1]. It is reported however that accuracy of the obtained shape due to springback effect [4], heterogeneous thickness strain distribution [3] and fabrication time are limitations of the process. Furthermore, simulations by Finite Element methods are time-consuming because of the incremental characteristics of the process [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%