SAE Technical Paper Series 2005
DOI: 10.4271/2005-01-1307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved Prediction of Hybrid-III Injury Values Using Advanced Multibody Techniques and Objective Rating

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the similarities evaluation between sets of experimental and numerical curves for both tested models was made by employing three different statistical metrics, namely Pearson correlation coefficient, Strague-Geers MPC metrics ( Ray, Anghileri & Mongiardini, 2008 ), and weighted integrated factor (WIFac) ( Hovenga et al, 2005 ). Pearson correlation is one of the most widely used metrics in curve analysis and measures the degree of linear correlation between two sets of data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the similarities evaluation between sets of experimental and numerical curves for both tested models was made by employing three different statistical metrics, namely Pearson correlation coefficient, Strague-Geers MPC metrics ( Ray, Anghileri & Mongiardini, 2008 ), and weighted integrated factor (WIFac) ( Hovenga et al, 2005 ). Pearson correlation is one of the most widely used metrics in curve analysis and measures the degree of linear correlation between two sets of data.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ORM coefficients for magnitude, phase, and shape for the IIHS and USNCAP load cases are shown in Table VI. The majority of all coefficients were above the good rating limit of 0.65 (Hovenga et al 2005). A few were below the limit: the phase of the global velocity in point III, the shape of the intrusion in point III, the magnitude and shape of the intrusion in point IV, and all of the coefficients of the intrusion in point I.…”
Section: Model Validitymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The coefficients take on values between 0 and 1, where 0 means no similarity and 1 means perfect similarity. Coefficient values over 0.65 are the outcome of comparable high repeatability hardware tests (Hovenga et al 2005), and the same limit was applied in this study.…”
Section: Model Validitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation