2012
DOI: 10.1080/15389588.2011.637411
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Parameter Study for Child Injury Mitigation in Near-Side Impacts Through FE Simulations

Abstract: The head and thorax-pelvis air bags have the potential to reduce injury measurements for both the SID-IIs and the HBM3, provided that the air bag properties are designed to consider these occupant sizes also. The seat belt pretensioner is also effective, provided that the lateral translation of the torso is managed by other features. The importance of lateral movement management is greater the smaller the occupant is. Light vehicles require interior restraint systems of higher performance than heavy vehicles d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In these cases, the principal mechanism of injury is contact with the vehicle interior, mainly associated with intrusion into the occupant compartment at the child’s position, combined with lateral translation of the child’s body. The development of side airbags that protect the head and thorax reduces injury measurements, provided that the airbag properties are designed to consider these occupant sizes [ 72 ]. The use of side airbags limits the probability of serious head and trunk injuries, confining them to upper extremity fractures and concussions with brief loss of consciousness [ 66 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In these cases, the principal mechanism of injury is contact with the vehicle interior, mainly associated with intrusion into the occupant compartment at the child’s position, combined with lateral translation of the child’s body. The development of side airbags that protect the head and thorax reduces injury measurements, provided that the airbag properties are designed to consider these occupant sizes [ 72 ]. The use of side airbags limits the probability of serious head and trunk injuries, confining them to upper extremity fractures and concussions with brief loss of consciousness [ 66 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All the articles discussed in this paragraph were uniformly published after the 2000s, with a clear division between those published before 2010 [ 44 , 47 , 51 , 53 , 57 , 58 , 60 , 63 , 66 ] and those published in the subsequent years, extending up to the most recent publications [ 69 , 72 , 84 , 85 , 88 , 91 , 94 , 98 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kimpara et al analyzed a female model and compared the results with a male model [ 21 ]. Andersson et al performed an analysis on child size and reported that light vehicles required higher performance interior restraint systems than larger vehicles [ 22 ]. Danelson et al and Digges et al analyzed lung contusions during motor vehicle accidents [ 23 , 24 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Side airbag curtains, which normally cover the rear occupant's window down to the window sill, have been shown to cause a reduction in fatality risk to drivers by 37% (McCartt and Kyrchenko 2007). Thorax side airbags are uncommon in the rear seat, but benefits of thorax side airbags to children can be expected (Andersson et al 2012;Bohman et al 2009;Bohman and Sunnevang 2012). Benefits to adults are found for the front seat (Loftis et al 2011b), showing a fatality reduction of 26% (McCartt and Kyrchenko 2007).…”
Section: Vehicle Restraintsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, head injuries are a well-documented problem in MVCs among children. In side impacts, the injury causation scenarios and built-in vehicle countermeasures have been identified (Maltese et al 2007;Andersson et al 2012;Bohman et al 2009). However, head injuries still occur in frontal crashes with seat-belt-restrained children, and thus far standardized vehicle tests in the laboratory have failed to reproduce the problem.…”
Section: Gaps In Child Safety Research: a Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%