2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.07.024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Improved charge separation and surface activation via boron-doped layered polyhedron SrTiO3 for co-catalyst free photocatalytic CO2 conversion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
58
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 118 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CO 2 -TPD is considered to be sensitive technique to provide detailed information about the interaction between the adsorbed gas molecules and the surface of catalysts. [23] As shown in Figure S21, BIF-29 exhibits one strong desorption peak at 233 8 8Cwhereas BIF-33 displays two weak desorption peaks at about 159 8 8Ca nd 226 8 8C, respectively.T his observation indicates BIF-29 displays relatively stronger CO 2 adsorption active sites compared to BIF-33, although BIF-29 ( Figure S2c) presents smaller amount of adsorbed CO 2 compared to BIF-33 ( Figure S15b), suggesting the catalysis mainly occur at the external surface.Meanwhile, theoretical calculation about CO 2 adsorption energy demonstrated that BIF-29 exhibited more negative adsorption energy of CO 2 compared to BIF-33, suggesting much stronger affinity of BIF-29 with unsaturated coordinated Cu sites towards CO 2 ( Figure S22 and Table S3). [1e,f, 24] Moreover,DFT calculations (Figure 3c)r evealed that for BIF-29, the formation energy of COOH is 1.26 eV for COOH intermediate adsorbed at Cu site.I nc ontrast, for I À -coordinated BIF-33, the COOH intermediate adsorb on Cu site with an extremely high formation energy of 1.63 eV due to the saturated coordination mode of Cu site.T his result indicates that BIF-29 favors the *COOH formation.…”
Section: Angewandte Chemiementioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CO 2 -TPD is considered to be sensitive technique to provide detailed information about the interaction between the adsorbed gas molecules and the surface of catalysts. [23] As shown in Figure S21, BIF-29 exhibits one strong desorption peak at 233 8 8Cwhereas BIF-33 displays two weak desorption peaks at about 159 8 8Ca nd 226 8 8C, respectively.T his observation indicates BIF-29 displays relatively stronger CO 2 adsorption active sites compared to BIF-33, although BIF-29 ( Figure S2c) presents smaller amount of adsorbed CO 2 compared to BIF-33 ( Figure S15b), suggesting the catalysis mainly occur at the external surface.Meanwhile, theoretical calculation about CO 2 adsorption energy demonstrated that BIF-29 exhibited more negative adsorption energy of CO 2 compared to BIF-33, suggesting much stronger affinity of BIF-29 with unsaturated coordinated Cu sites towards CO 2 ( Figure S22 and Table S3). [1e,f, 24] Moreover,DFT calculations (Figure 3c)r evealed that for BIF-29, the formation energy of COOH is 1.26 eV for COOH intermediate adsorbed at Cu site.I nc ontrast, for I À -coordinated BIF-33, the COOH intermediate adsorb on Cu site with an extremely high formation energy of 1.63 eV due to the saturated coordination mode of Cu site.T his result indicates that BIF-29 favors the *COOH formation.…”
Section: Angewandte Chemiementioning
confidence: 92%
“…[13] To further reveal the surface-active species,wec arried out in situ electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) experiments under visible light irradiation. [23] As shown in Figure S21, BIF-29 exhibits one strong desorption peak at 233 8 8Cwhereas BIF-33 displays two weak desorption peaks at about 159 8 8Ca nd 226 8 8C, respectively.T his observation indicates BIF-29 displays relatively stronger CO 2 adsorption active sites compared to BIF-33, although BIF-29 ( Figure S2c) presents smaller amount of adsorbed CO 2 compared to BIF-33 ( Figure S15b), suggesting the catalysis mainly occur at the external surface.Meanwhile, theoretical calculation about CO 2 adsorption energy demonstrated that BIF-29 exhibited more negative adsorption energy of CO 2 compared to BIF-33, suggesting much stronger affinity of BIF-29 with unsaturated coordinated Cu sites towards CO 2 ( Figure S22 and Table S3). Figure S19 indicated that the EPR signal for BIF-29 decrease in density with irradiation time under nitrogen atmosphere.A sacomparison, the EPR signal of Icoordinated BIF-33 keep nearly unchanged.…”
mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Therefore, the cocatalysts must gather photogenerated charge carriers at specific reaction sites to drive efficient CO 2 photoreduction. Apart from this, Yan et al also reported CO 2 reduction via reversed water gas shift (RWGS) reaction to produce CO, and Shan et al published their work in CO 2 conversion to CH 4 CO2+40.25emH++40.25emeHCHO+H2normalO0.25emEo=0.480.25emnormalV0.25emvs0.25emNHE, CO2+80.25emH++80.25emeCH4+20.25emH2normalO0.25emEo=0.240.25emnormalV0.25emvs0.25emNHE. …”
Section: Applications Of Srtio3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shan et al [227] used a boron-doped version of SrTiO 3 for photocatalytic conversion of CO 2 . It was reported that the photocatalytic activity of boron-doped SrTiO 3 enhanced by almost 3-fold by the improvement of charge separation potential.…”
Section: Solar Fuelsmentioning
confidence: 99%