2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2010.08.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Important sensors for chiller fault detection and diagnosis (FDD) from the perspective of feature selection and machine learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
33
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
33
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This study introduces a correction function g to compensate for the systematic error in the measurements, as shown in Eq. (5). The correction function of one sensor is formulated with offsetting constants and its measurement M. The specific equation is based on a characteristic of the systematic sensor error.…”
Section: Benchmark and Correction Function In Virtual In-situ Calibramentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study introduces a correction function g to compensate for the systematic error in the measurements, as shown in Eq. (5). The correction function of one sensor is formulated with offsetting constants and its measurement M. The specific equation is based on a characteristic of the systematic sensor error.…”
Section: Benchmark and Correction Function In Virtual In-situ Calibramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address the challenges in the building sector, a comprehensive solution package, including continuous fine-tuning of building automation systems, automated analytical optimization, and automated fault detection, diagnostics and repair, is needed. Research into these challenges has been conducted in order to help mitigate increasing energy use in buildings [3][4][5][6][7][8]. Most of the proposed approaches will be effective only if the data obtained from sensors are reliable and accurate [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhou et al (2009) developed a modelbased FDD algorithm for chillers based on a semi-empirical chiller model from Ma et al (2008). Han et al (2011) developed a machine-learning-based FDD algorithm using data from Comstock and Braun (1999b). Zhao et al (2012) developed a virtual condenser fouling sensor for chillers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although not included in the four methods described by Reddy et al (2003), a Kalman-filter based chiller model was used in Navarro-Esbrí et al (2006) to create a chiller fault detection algorithm. Furthermore, machine-learning based FDD algorithms such as Han et al (2011) typically use machine-learning algorithms to create a model of faulted chillers to be used in the chiller FDD. DOE-2 (DOE-2 2014) and EnergyPlus (EnergyPlus 2015) are commonly used building simulation programs that employ the linear empirical chiller model originally developed for DOE-2.1 (DOE 1981).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under the conventional HVAC control structure, the majority of sensor fault detection and diagnosis (SFDD) methods are based on a centralized algorithm [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19]. To the best of our knowledge, these methods have a series of disadvantages, such as poor adaptability and instantaneity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%