Important considerations for radiochromic film dosimetry with flatbed CCD scanners and EBT film

High dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy is one of the accepted treatment modalities in gastro‐intestinal tract and bladder carcinomas. Considering the shortcoming of contact brachytherapy routinely used in gastrointestinal tract in treatment of big tumors or invasive method of bladder treatment, an intraluminal applicator with the capability of insertion into the tumor depth seems to be useful. This study presents some dosimetric evaluations to introduce this applicator to the clinical use. The radiation attenuation characteristics of the applicator were evaluated by means of two dosimetric methods including well‐type chamber and radiochromic film. The proposed 110 cm long applicator has a flexible structure made of stainless steel for easy passage through lumens and a needle tip to drill into big tumors. The 2 mm diameter of the applicator is thick enough for source transition, while easy passage through any narrow lumen such as endoscope or cystoscope working channel is ensured. Well‐chamber results showed an acceptably low attenuation of this steel springy applicator. Performing absolute dosimetry resulted in a correlation coefficient of normalR=0.9916false(normalp‐value≈10−7false) between standard interstitial applicator and the one proposed in this article. This study not only introduces a novel applicator with acceptable attenuation but also proves the response independency of the GAFCHROMIC EBT films to energy. By applying the dose response of the applicator in the treatment planning software, it can be used as a new intraluminal / interstitial applicator.PACS number: 87.53.Bn, 87.53.Jw, 29.40.Cs

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 62%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Dosimetric evaluation of a novel high dose rate (HDR) intraluminal / interstitial brachytherapy applicator for gastrointestinal and bladder cancers

Tabrizi¹,

Aghamiri²,

Najarian

et al. 2010

“…The response of flatbed scanners has been shown to vary in the direction parallel to the lamp 17 , 19 , 22 . A homogeneity correction matrix can be constructed from the images of uniformly exposed films (22) by calculating the pixel value differences relative to the center of the scanner bed in order to correct for this variation.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Flatbed scanners have been shown to have a nonuniform response in the regions perpendicular to the scanning direction 17 , 19 , 22 . It is necessary to correct the optical densities measured to account for this artifact.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Reference dosimetry using radiochromic film

Girard

Bouchard

Lacroix

2012

The objectives of this study are to identify and quantify factors that influence radiochromic film dose response and to determine whether such films are suitable for reference dosimetry. The influence of several parameters that may introduce systematic dose errors when performing reference dose measurements were investigated. The effect of the film storage temperature was determined by comparing the performance of three lots of GAFCHROMIC EBT2 films stored at either 4°C or room temperature. The effect of high (>80%) or low (<20%) relative humidity was also determined. Doses measured in optimal conditions with EBT and EBT2 films were then compared with an A12 ionization chamber measurement. Intensity‐modulated radiation therapy quality controls using EBT2 films were also performed in reference dose. The results obtained using reference dose measurements were compared with those obtained using relative dose measurements. Storing the film at 4°C improves the stability of the film over time, but does not eliminate the noncatalytic film development, seen as a rise in optical density over time in the absence of radiation. Relative humidity variations ranging from 80% to 20% have a strong impact on the optical density and could introduce dose errors of up to 15% if the humidity were not controlled during the film storage period. During the scanning procedure, the film temperature influences the optical density that is measured. When controlling for these three parameters, the dose differences between EBT or EBT2 and the A12 chamber are found to be within ±4% (2σ level) over a dose range of 20–350 cGy. Our results also demonstrate the limitation of the Anisotropic Analytical Algorithm for dose calculation of highly modulated treatment plans.PACS numbers: 87.55.Qr; 87.56.Fc

Comprehensive evaluation of the high‐resolution diode array for SRS dosimetry

Ahmed

Zhang

Moros

et al. 2019

A high‐resolution diode array has been comprehensively evaluated. It consists of 1013 point diode detectors arranged on the two 7.7 × 7.7 cm2 printed circuit boards (PCBs). The PCBs are aligned face to face in such a way that the active volumes of all diodes are in the same plane. All individual correction factors required for accurate dosimetry have been validated for conventional and flattening filter free (FFF) 6MV beams. That included diode response equalization, linearity, repetition rate dependence, field size dependence, angular dependence at the central axis and off‐axis in the transverse, sagittal, and multiple arbitrary planes. In the end‐to‐end tests the array and radiochromic film dose distributions for SRS‐type multiple‐target plans were compared. In the equalization test (180° rotation), the average percent dose error between the normal and rotated positions for all diodes was 0.01% ± 0.1% (range −0.3 to 0.4%) and −0.01% ± 0.2% (range −0.9 to 0.9%) for 6 MV and 6MV FFF beams, respectively. For the axial angular response, corrected dose stayed within 2% from the ion chamber for all gantry angles, until the beam direction approached the detector plane. In azimuthal direction, the device agreed with the scintillator within 1% for both energies. For multiple combinations of couch and gantry angles, the average percent errors were −0.00% ± 0.6% (range: −2.1% to 1.6%) and −0.1% ± 0.5% (range −1.6% to 2.1%) for the 6MV and 6MV FFF beams, respectively. The measured output factors were largely within 2% of the scintillator, except for the 5 mm 6MV beam showing a 3.2% deviation. The 2%/1 mm gamma analysis of composite SRS measurements produced the 97.2 ± 1.3% (range 95.8‐98.5%) average passing rate against film. Submillimeter (≤0.5 mm) dose profile alignment with film was demonstrated in all cases.