2011
DOI: 10.22256/pubvet.v5n2.1004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Importância de teste de DNA para verificação de parentesco em Búfalos (Bubalus bubalis)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, results of many studies on Indian and Guilan buffalo breeds revealed also high values of PIC (0.52–0.88) for most studied markers [ 14 , 15 , 65 , 66 ]. Other researchers [ 10 , 12 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 ] reported varied values of PIC for several markers which ranging between moderate (0.34–0.48) and high (0.51–0.82). The PIC values variability observed in the literature may be due to different microsatellite markers used in the studied populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Moreover, results of many studies on Indian and Guilan buffalo breeds revealed also high values of PIC (0.52–0.88) for most studied markers [ 14 , 15 , 65 , 66 ]. Other researchers [ 10 , 12 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 ] reported varied values of PIC for several markers which ranging between moderate (0.34–0.48) and high (0.51–0.82). The PIC values variability observed in the literature may be due to different microsatellite markers used in the studied populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Results of many studies on Indian and Guilan buffalo breeds showed also high values of PIC (0.52-0.88) for most studied markers (Tantia et al, 2006;Aminafshar et al, 2008;Kataria et al, 2009;Jakhesara et al, 2010;Kathiravan et al, 2012;Singh et al, 2017). Other researchers (Arora et al, 2004;Ángel-Marín et al, 2010;Bhuyan et al, 2010;Vieira et al, 2011;Rad et al, 2013;Ünal et al, 2014) reported varied values of PIC for several markers which ranging between moderate (0.34-0.48) and high (0.51-0.82).…”
Section: Polymorphic Information Content (Pic)mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…A total of 15 microsatellite markers were chosen for this study from the cattle genome based on their high polymorphism, polymorphic information content (PIC) with good heterozygosity and information available from previous studies in buffalo (Moore et al, 1995;Barker et al, 1997;Moioli et al, 2001;Tantia et al, 2006;Elbeltagy et al, 2008;Zhang et al, 2008;Bhuyan et al, 2010;Jakhesara et al, 2010;Marques et al, 2011;Vieira et al, 2011;Acosta et al, 2014;Ünal et al, 2014). These microsatellites were BMC1013, CSSM019, CSSM022, CSSM029, CSSM036, CSSM038, CSSM041, CSSM043, CSSM045, CSSM046, CSSM047, ETH3 (D19S2), BM1818, ILSTS005, and ILSTS33.…”
Section: Selection Of Microsatellites Markers and Pcr Amplificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Silva et al (2014) propuseram um painel com 16 marcadores microssatélites para teste de paternidade em caprinos locais e comerciais, PE1 e PE2 de 99,98% e 99,99%. Vieira et al (2011) desenvolveu um painel para teste de paternidade em búfalos com 13 marcadores microssatélites para identificação genética e de paternidade em búfalos, o que se demonstrou eficiente.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified