2012
DOI: 10.1159/000338611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implications of Peripheral Muscular and Anatomical Development for the Acquisition of Lingual Control for Speech Production: A Review

Abstract: Objectives: Normally developing children learn to produce intelligible speech during rapid, non-uniform growth of their articulators and other vocal tract structures. The purpose of this review is to focus attention on the consequences of peripheral growth and development for the acquisition of lingual control for speech production. This paper (1) reviews physiological underpinnings of tongue shaping and movements that are likely to be changing in young children; (2) estimates, from previously published studie… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 119 publications
(78 reference statements)
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As suggested previously (Denny & McGowan, 2012;Gick et al, 2008;Studdert-Kennedy & Goldstein, 2003), speech sounds that involve two lingual constrictions should be acquired especially late due to physiological constraints and, more specifically, to the delay in development of the tongue compared with the oral cavity. Given that development of the tongue does not stabilize until age 5;6, whereas the size of the oral cavity stabilizes by age 3;0, we expect that children between ages 3;0 and 5;6 would have difficulty producing laterals with both an anterior tongue tip or blade constriction and a posterior tongue dorsum constriction.…”
Section: Acquisition Of English /L/mentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As suggested previously (Denny & McGowan, 2012;Gick et al, 2008;Studdert-Kennedy & Goldstein, 2003), speech sounds that involve two lingual constrictions should be acquired especially late due to physiological constraints and, more specifically, to the delay in development of the tongue compared with the oral cavity. Given that development of the tongue does not stabilize until age 5;6, whereas the size of the oral cavity stabilizes by age 3;0, we expect that children between ages 3;0 and 5;6 would have difficulty producing laterals with both an anterior tongue tip or blade constriction and a posterior tongue dorsum constriction.…”
Section: Acquisition Of English /L/mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…However, the structures do not develop uniformly. Indeed, this specific argument has been invoked to explain the protractedness of English /a / development (Denny & McGowan, 2012;McGowan, Nittrouer, & Manning, 2004) as well as that of English liquids, including / l / (Gick et al, 2008). As Denny and McGowan (2012) pointed out, this suggests that the size and shape of the oral cavity matures earlier than does the tongue.…”
Section: Physiological Developmentmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…[i] contrast through vertical tongue displacement along the second axis. These two axes do have different orientations in baboons and humans, due to the differences in the inclination of the styloglossus and the shape of the tongue (Badin and Serrurier, 2006;Buchaillard et al, 2010;Denny and McGowan, 2012;Honda, 1996).…”
Section: Tongue Musculature and Consequences For Vocalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Defined as the Dronkers area was the cerebral area for the coordination of articulatory movements of speech 5 . Speech Motor Control is developed differently from the initial speakers and depends on the interaction with the phonological development 4,6,19,22,27,28 .…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%