2015
DOI: 10.1044/2014_jslhr-s-14-0041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Children's Acquisition of English Onset and Coda /l/: Articulatory Evidence

Abstract: The disparity in the production and perception of children's singleton onset /l/s is linked to both physiological and phonological development. Suggestions are made for future research to tease these factors apart.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For recording sufficient numbers of repetitions from the youngest participants, the optimal procedure was found to be repeating after the child's carer. While different elicitation methods have been used in some previous studies of young children's speech production, including those using ultrasound (e.g., Song et al, 2013;Lin and Demuth, 2015;McAllister Byun et al, 2016), in the present study repeating after the carer was the most natural behaviour for young children involved in playing a game together with the carer. All CV syllable tokens by the 3-and 5-year-old participants included in across-group comparison were perceptually correct realisations, which ensured comparability with older children's productions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For recording sufficient numbers of repetitions from the youngest participants, the optimal procedure was found to be repeating after the child's carer. While different elicitation methods have been used in some previous studies of young children's speech production, including those using ultrasound (e.g., Song et al, 2013;Lin and Demuth, 2015;McAllister Byun et al, 2016), in the present study repeating after the carer was the most natural behaviour for young children involved in playing a game together with the carer. All CV syllable tokens by the 3-and 5-year-old participants included in across-group comparison were perceptually correct realisations, which ensured comparability with older children's productions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For 3-and 5-year-olds, the ultrasound transducer was instead hand-held by the experimenter (see other ultrasound studies of young children's speech using hand-held recordings, e.g., Song et al, 2013;Lin and Demuth, 2015;Magloughlin, 2016). It was possible to use the same measures in this study for quantifying tongue shape in both stabilised and hand-held ultrasound data, because the measures have previously been shown to produce the same results for these 2 types of data (Zharkova et al, 2015a).…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 41 ], observing that F2 height increased with age in toddlers acquiring /ɹ/, suggested that some child speakers lack the articulatory skill necessary to lower F3 to adult-like levels, and instead rely on decreased F3—F2 distance to mark the rhotic category. At the same time, young children produce /l/ with an unusually high F2 because of their use of light /l/ instead of the articulatorily more complex dark /l/ (see detailed discussion in Lin and Demuth [ 42 ]). If these production-oriented factors do play a prominent role in determining F2 height in both /ɹ/ and /l/, it could mask any influence of perception, accounting for Idemaru and Holt's [ 40 ] failure to find a systematic relationship between perception and production of the F2 cue.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, our study remains rather descriptive and exploratory, which would require more refined research on the individual cases of exceptions to have a better understanding the interactions among the acoustic, phonetic, phonological, and semantic factors in the learning process in both domains of perception and production. In this regard, studying positional asymmetry and the relationship between perception and production in second language acquisition may also benefit from studies of the same nature in the domain of first language acquisition to have a better understanding of the physiological, articulatory, and perceptual factors as well as language-universal and language-specific properties in phonetic learning (e.g., Lin and Demuth, 2015 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%