2017
DOI: 10.5812/ijo.10201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation of Recent Infection Prevention Procedures Published by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Difficulties and Problems in Orthodontic Offices

Abstract: Context: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has recently published its "Summary of Infection Prevention Practices in Dental Settings: Basic Expectations for Safe Care", but information concerning compliance, occupational hazards, and specific recommendations for orthodontic facilities is less widely available. Evidence Acquisition: We searched electronic English articles published in PubMed and Google Scholar databases (2010-May 2016) using various combinations of the key indexing terms. Results: 9… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
(31 reference statements)
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The insufficient compliance of guidelines during infection prevention in dentistry depends on the limited awareness of the infective risk and mainly the fact that the dentist will not share the same fate of the patient in the case of an adverse event (AE), but the financial-occupational consequences can be just as serious as that of an airplane crash [5-8, 56, 58, 59]. Here, we confirm the current significant extent of violations and main noncompliance in IC observed in dental settings ( Table 1), sadly not different from those previously reported [12][13][14][15][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68].…”
Section: Noncompliance Lapses and Errors During Infection Preventiosupporting
confidence: 86%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The insufficient compliance of guidelines during infection prevention in dentistry depends on the limited awareness of the infective risk and mainly the fact that the dentist will not share the same fate of the patient in the case of an adverse event (AE), but the financial-occupational consequences can be just as serious as that of an airplane crash [5-8, 56, 58, 59]. Here, we confirm the current significant extent of violations and main noncompliance in IC observed in dental settings ( Table 1), sadly not different from those previously reported [12][13][14][15][60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68].…”
Section: Noncompliance Lapses and Errors During Infection Preventiosupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Glove perforation was 17% in maxillofacial surgery, and occurred significantly more frequently in procedures that exceeded 90 minutes than in those taking less time or during surgical procedure with a high risk of percutaneous injury rate (long procedures: intermaxillary fixation, sinus lift), in surgeon and first assistants. In addition, endodontia and orthognathic surgery are at high risk of glove perforation [13,73]. Needlestick and sharp injuries occur as a consequence of poor visibility, unexpected patient movements, and during the clearing up of dental instruments at the end of treatments and manual cleaning [27][28][29]74].…”
Section: Hand and Glove Contamination Of Dhcpmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations