Implementation of innovations in enterprises using the EU funds: A comparative analysis

Abstract

The European Union sees the role of innovations as measurably influencing the improvement of social and economic development in the regions of its member states. Actions that promote the implementation of innovations in the SME sector as one of the elements having a positive impact on the European Union's cohesion policy have a special role in supporting enterprises. Therefore, the EU operational programmes dedicated to small and medium-sized enterprises are a valuable source of external financing for innovations in these entities. The implementation of innovative investment projects positively influences the development of enterprises. A company resistant to implementing innovations may lose its competitive position on the market and slow down its development. The aim of this article is to conduct a comparative analysis of the implementation of innovative investments between the enterprises that received financial assistance from the European Union in relation to the enterprises that implemented innovations using other sources of financing. The study shows that enterprises covered by financial support from operational programmes have a higher level of innovative investments than other economic entities. Companies receiving EU aid are more often implementing production innovations among all four types of innovations as compared to other enterprises. In addition, it was found that in the lack of financial support from the EU, almost half of the companies would not be able to implement innovations as such. Therefore, the issue of innovations implemented in enterprises with the use of the EU financial aid should be considered as a currently relevant topic and an extremely important one from the standpoint of entrepreneurship development. This study should be considered unique, as there are no studies, to the best of the author's knowledge, containing comparative analyses in this area.

Efekty zewnętrzne dyfuzji wiedzy w miastach a pandemia COVID-19

“…Interesującym fenomenem wspierającym wzrost społeczno -gospodarczy aglomeracji, który wciąż wymaga pogłębionej analizy, jest dyfuzja wiedzy, czyli niekontrolowane i nieintencjonalne rozprzestrzenianie się jej między jednostkami lub strukturami ekonomicznymi. W literaturze określa się go różnymi terminami: spillover, efekty zewnętrzne przepływu wiedzy/kreatywności, efekty pośrednie, przenikanie, rozlewanie się, rozprzestrzenianie się wiedzy (Augustyn, 2017), która wpływa na wdrażanie innowacji w przedsiębiorstwach (Piątkowski, 2020).…”

Economy of knowledge and transfer of innovations: Ukraine’s progress through the lens of European development trends

“…Within the framework of this approach, special ). An important aspect is also the factor of belonging to the global sector of companies, which, unlike firms focused on the domestic market, maintain strong ties with both private and public scientific organizations (Piątkowski, 2020).…”

How innovativeness of family-owned SMEs differ depending on their characteristics?

“…For instance, according to Civelek and Ključnikov (2018) and Civelek and Dursun (2018), businesses in the service industry more substantially lack tangible, intangible, and perishable assets for bank loan collateral than businesses in the manufacturing industry. Manufacturing firms also have easier access to other external funds, for instance, EU funds of financial support (Piątkowski, 2020). For these reasons, when applying innovative activities, service firms can lack the capital to make investments compared to manufacturing SMEs, which may affect their innovativeness.…”