The 20th Asia and South Pacific Design Automation Conference 2015
DOI: 10.1109/aspdac.2015.7058919
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation of double arbiter PUF and its performance evaluation on FPGA

Abstract: Low uniqueness and vulnerability to machine-learning attacks are known as two major problems of Arbiter-Based Physically Unclonable Function (APUF) implemented on FPGAs. In this paper, we implement Double APUF (DAPUF) that duplicates the original APUF in order to overcome the problems. From the experimental results on Xilinx Virtex-5, we show that the uniqueness of DAPUF becomes almost ideal, and the prediction rate of the machine-learning attack decreases from 86% to 57%.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The uniqueness of [43] is 36.75% in a different evaluation method, in which the ideal uniqueness value is 100% other than 50%, that is commonly utilized. The uniqueness results for the conventional APUF implemented on FPGA are 4.70% by [42], 7.20% by [44] and 9.42% by [11], respectively. The 2-1 double APUF and 3-1 double APUF, which mix two or three APUFs to generate one 1-bit response, achieve higher uniqueness [42] but have to sacrifice reliability.…”
Section: Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The uniqueness of [43] is 36.75% in a different evaluation method, in which the ideal uniqueness value is 100% other than 50%, that is commonly utilized. The uniqueness results for the conventional APUF implemented on FPGA are 4.70% by [42], 7.20% by [44] and 9.42% by [11], respectively. The 2-1 double APUF and 3-1 double APUF, which mix two or three APUFs to generate one 1-bit response, achieve higher uniqueness [42] but have to sacrifice reliability.…”
Section: Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The uniqueness results for the conventional APUF implemented on FPGA are 4.70% by [42], 7.20% by [44] and 9.42% by [11], respectively. The 2-1 double APUF and 3-1 double APUF, which mix two or three APUFs to generate one 1-bit response, achieve higher uniqueness [42] but have to sacrifice reliability. [35] achieves higher uniqueness results when introducing tuning circuits.…”
Section: Reliabilitymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Moudgil et al [19] proposed a circuit-based technique for detecting counterfeits. Some other scholars [20] tried to apply machine learning-based approach with statistical techniques to detect counterfeits. Most statistical-related approaches were based on the data analysis deriving from old data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many existing PUFs, such as ring oscillator (RO) [9][10][11] and arbiter-based [7,12] designs, are complex and hard to integrate for device manufacturers into their application ICs, due to great design overheads or poor performance in security metrics. In the past years, analog-based PUF circuits have been proposed that use lower complexity circuit designs while achieving very good results in PUF security metrics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%