2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2012.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Implementation of a dose–response curve for γ-radiation in the Portuguese population by use of the chromosomal aberration assay

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
14
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(52 reference statements)
5
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The above calculation of u showed that the dicentric followed a Poisson distribution patterns (u ≥ ± 1.96) at the low dose whereas at the dose 0,5 -4 Gy follow non Poisson distribution (u ≤ ± 1.96). The similar result also found in research conducted by Martin et al whereas the dicentric distribution were consistent with Poisson at the lower doses but were over dispersed at the higher doses (1-3 Gy) [18]. This result is likely influenced by the sensitivity of each chromosome.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The above calculation of u showed that the dicentric followed a Poisson distribution patterns (u ≥ ± 1.96) at the low dose whereas at the dose 0,5 -4 Gy follow non Poisson distribution (u ≤ ± 1.96). The similar result also found in research conducted by Martin et al whereas the dicentric distribution were consistent with Poisson at the lower doses but were over dispersed at the higher doses (1-3 Gy) [18]. This result is likely influenced by the sensitivity of each chromosome.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…However, until recently, the construction of curves based on individual variability of dicentric chromosomes have not been well studied. Martins et al (2013) produced calibration curves based on data from sixteen donors. The donors were distributed by age and gender to examine potential effects on any differences observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also emphasized that the dose rate was an important factor in dose estimations. Thus, intercomparison exercises should take into account the dose rates of the participating laboratories, because the dose rates might explain why Curve with low dose rate 7 Bauchinger et al (1983) versus Köksal et al (1995) Bauchinger (2002) versus Köksal et al (1995) Schmid et al (2002 versus Lloyd et al (1986) This work versus Köksal et al (1995) This work versus Lloyd et al (1986) Martins et al (2013) versus Köksal et al (1995) Martins et al (2013 versus Lloyd et al (1986) Dose rate (Gy/min)/0.5 Gy/min 3% -91%…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, dicentrics and MN decline over time and are not appropriate for dose estimation several months after an exposure. Stable cytogenetic endpoints persist longer and have been used successfully in the follow-up study of a radiation accident [2,3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%