2006
DOI: 10.1109/tpel.2005.861112
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impedance criterion for power modules comparison

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it can be concluded that magnetic effects were responsible of the perturbation. Cabling rules used in [11] confirmed this remark. In such integrated structures, it is not easy to modify the internal gate circuit layout, as it was done in [11], especially due to double sided technology.…”
Section: Investigation Of Internal Disturbance In a Double Sided supporting
confidence: 62%
“…Therefore, it can be concluded that magnetic effects were responsible of the perturbation. Cabling rules used in [11] confirmed this remark. In such integrated structures, it is not easy to modify the internal gate circuit layout, as it was done in [11], especially due to double sided technology.…”
Section: Investigation Of Internal Disturbance In a Double Sided supporting
confidence: 62%
“…The 3D model includes the wire bonds. The complete workflow, from the 3D description to the generation of a circuit model compatible with the Saber R software is described in detail in [24]. As this circuit model contains 32 ports (16 impedances and the coupling between any two of these), it is too large to be shown here.…”
Section: A Phase-leg Inverter Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, when one aims to precisely evaluate disturbances, the usual models need to be more detailed. Electrical components in particular have to be described with all their stray elements including the ones due to the integration in the complex electromagnetic environment [3][4][5]. This increasing complexity of models unfortunately directly impacts on the time of simulation that can become unreasonably long.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%