Impacts on the U.S. macroeconomy of mandatory business closures in response to the COVID-19 Pandemic

Abstract

We estimate the macroeconomic impacts of mandatory business closures in the U.S. and many other countries in order to control the spread of the COVID-19. The analysis is based on the application of a modified version of the GTAP model. We simulate mandatory closures in all countries or parts of countries that had imposed them as of 7 April for three-month and sixmonth cases. For the three-month scenario, we estimate a 20.3% decline of U.S. GDP on an annual basis, or $4.3 trillion. The employment decline of 22.4% in the U.S. for the three-month closure represents 35.2 million workers for that period. If the mandatory closures are extended to six months because of a second wave, these negative impacts would slightly more than double. The employment impacts are slightly greater in percentage terms than the GDP impacts because most service sectors, which are generally more labour-intensive, are more negatively impacted by the closures than are 'essential' sectors. Our results should be considered upper-bound estimates given such assumptions as businesses laying off workers no longer paying them wages or salaries. Note also that the article examines the mandatory closures alone and does not factor in any countervailing fiscal or monetary policies.

COVID-19 and Forests in Canada and the United States: Initial Assessment and Beyond

“…Besides the tragedy of hundreds of thousands of deaths, normal social interactions have been curtailed by individuals and governments in an effort to stem the spread of the virus. The resulting cascade of impacts on individual lives, shuttered businesses and unemployment, over-stressed public health providers, and reduced fiscal capacity of governments to respond and provide safety nets has created enormous hardships in the short-term (Lund et al, 2020;Walmsley et al, 2020), with likely but uncertain long-term impacts (Nikolopoulos et al, 2020). Even though effective vaccines were developed by December 2020, by June 2021, only 12% of the world population was vaccinated (at least one dose) and the rate in the United States and Canada was 51% and 63%, respectively 2 .…”

Is there a pattern in how COVID-19 has affected Australia’s stock returns?

“…; air quality (Ming et al 2020); insurance (Wang et al 2020); macroeconomy (Walmsley, Rose, and Wei 2020) trade (Vidya and Prabheesh 2020); labour market response (Yu et al…”

Dynamics of Malaysia’s Bilateral Export Post Covid-19: A Gravity Model Analysis

“…However, in terms of export, the World Trade Organization (2020) results indicate that exports from North America and Asia will hit the hardest. The varying impact has motivated several studies to analyse countryspecific impacts, such as for Canada (McEwan et al 2020;Barichello 2020), United States (Walmsley et al 2020), China (Cao et al 2020), and Africa (Ataguba 2020).…”

“…In analysing the trade implications, several methods have been utilised, and these methods can be categorised into the ex-ante and ex-post analysis. The ex-ante analysis is simulation-based studies such as the computable general equilibrium (Walmsley et al 2020;Zeshan 2020), system dynamic (Wang et al 2020), and network analysis (Vidya & Prabheesh 2020). Although few methods in the ex-ante analysis are among the most preferred in trade analysis, these methods subject to few drawbacks such as usage of outdated data, ad-hoc simulation scenario, and numerous assumptions (Dixon & Jorgenson 2013;Raza et al 2014;Kehoe et al 2017).…”

“…Thus, their studies may subject to aggregation bias and unable to explain the varying sectoral impact. In addition, lack of empirical studies used current data, as most used simulation analysis (Walmsley et al 2020;Zeshan 2020) based on the past base year and subject to simulation scenario and numerous assumptions (Dixon & Jorgenson 2013;Kehoe et al 2017). The utilisation of real trade data able to represent the actual impact of the current pandemic outbreak.…”