“…Nevertheless, statistically significant decreases in WBC (Davoudi et al 2012 ; Mezhoud et al 2014 ; Shahid et al 2015a ; Tavakkoli et al 2012 ), neutrophil (Shahid et al 2015a ; Taqi et al 2018 ), monocytes (Taqi et al 2018 ), basophile (Taqi et al 2018 ) lymphocytes (Sabagh and Chaparian 2019 ), PLT (Dainiak 2002 ; Davoudi et al 2012 ; Faraj and Mohammed 2018 ; Meo 2004 ; Mezhoud et al 2014 ; Sabagh and Chaparian 2019 ; Shafiee et al 2016b ; Shahid et al 2015a ; Taqi et al 2018 ), RBC (Abdolmaleki et al 2012 ; Heydarheydari et al 2016 ), HGB (Abdolmaleki et al 2012 ; Heydarheydari et al 2016 ; Shahid et al 2015a ), MCV (Abdolmaleki et al 2012 ; Heydarheydari et al 2016 ; Taqi et al 2018 ), RDW (Taqi et al 2018 ), HCT (Shahid et al 2015a ), MCH (Shahid et al 2015a , 2014 ), and MCHC levels (Sabagh and Chaparian 2019 ; Shahid et al 2015a ) were reported in radiation workers compared with the control group. Also, the result of some studies yielded a significantly increased level of WBC (Nureddin and Alatta 2016 ), lymphocytes (Shahid et al 2015a ; Taqi et al 2018 ), PLT (Nureddin and Alatta 2016 ; Sayed et al 2011 ), RBC (Shahid et al 2015a ; Taqi et al 2018 ), MCV (Abdolmaleki et al 2012 ), HGB (Shahid et al 2015a ; Taqi et al 2018 ), and HCT (Sabagh and Chaparian 2019 ; Shahid et al 2015a ; Taqi et al 2018 ) in response to low-dose radiation. Several factors could explain these discrepancies and commonalities between previous literature and our findings, including study design, study sites, sample of study, characteristics of the participants (whether the radiation workers or control group), time of blood sampling, and other covariates (e.g., time and duration of exposure), and more importantly we cannot preclude the reporting bias that may cause some differences between findings.…”