2020
DOI: 10.3386/w27235
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of State Reopening Policy on Human Mobility

Abstract: The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. At least one co-author has disclosed a financial relationship of potential relevance for this research. Further information is available online at http://www.nber.org/papers/w27235.ack NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer-reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
51
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(31 reference statements)
7
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although rates of recent unemployment and absence from work are still very high in the May CPS data, reopening policies have reduced the negative impact of the epidemic on the labor market. The improvements in labor market outcomes are consistent with cell signal data, which show a rise in physical mobility starting in mid-April and continuing through May (Nguyen et al 2020). Of course, it is unclear whether these returns to normalcy can be sustained in the face of more recent increases in COVID-19 cases and hospitalizations.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Although rates of recent unemployment and absence from work are still very high in the May CPS data, reopening policies have reduced the negative impact of the epidemic on the labor market. The improvements in labor market outcomes are consistent with cell signal data, which show a rise in physical mobility starting in mid-April and continuing through May (Nguyen et al 2020). Of course, it is unclear whether these returns to normalcy can be sustained in the face of more recent increases in COVID-19 cases and hospitalizations.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…This may be possible due to the increased awareness of the population of the ongoing COVID-19 epidemic in Wuhan and other areas of China. In fact, it has become apparent that individual and collective human behavior has had subtle and recognizable effects on SARS-CoV-2 transmission [22][23][24][25]. After the declaration of the public health emergency on January 24 and the adoption of strict control measures, we estimated a quick reduction of daily reproduction number, similar to what observed in other provinces of China [10] and elsewhere [26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 64%
“…30,32 Figure 3 shows a weakly positive correlation between temperature and park visitation but a lack of correlation between temperature and encounter rate. In other words, while people in most states change their behavior to visit parks more when temperatures are higher, in line with previous work, 13,33 their potential encounter rates do not significantly increase (with a few exceptions). (Similar trends are observed on the county level in Extended Data Figure 5.…”
Section: Effects Of Weather On Mobilitysupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Most of these states experienced a new surge in COVID-19 cases in July, 10 consistent with studies that argue that an early reopening led to the new wave. [11][12][13] Dates of reaching 30% of pre-pandemic potential encounter rate are not correlated with implementation dates of reopening plans (R 2 =0.062) or with expirations of stay-at-home orders (R 2 =0.049), which is further evidence that mobility behaviors are substantially independent of state policies. The consistency across mobility measures suggests the primacy of national awareness and national guidelines over state policies in determining human behavior.…”
Section: Mobility Changes and Policy Timingmentioning
confidence: 99%