2011
DOI: 10.3368/le.87.2.312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impacts of Land Certification on Tenure Security, Investment, and Land Market Participation: Evidence from Ethiopia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
145
0
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 256 publications
(152 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
145
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In Vietnam, awarding certificates prompted higher investment in perennials and prompted households, especially the poor, to spend more time in non-agricultural activities (Do and Iyer 2008). In Ethiopia land certification helped to empower women and led to increased productivity as well as land market transactions (Deininger et al 2011a). Titles that include women in Argentina are also credited with having helped to reduce fertility and increase investment in children's human capital (Galiani and Schargrodsky 2004) although impacts arise through investment in physical and human capital rather than through improved credit access (Galiani and Schargrodsky 2010).…”
Section: Empirical Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Vietnam, awarding certificates prompted higher investment in perennials and prompted households, especially the poor, to spend more time in non-agricultural activities (Do and Iyer 2008). In Ethiopia land certification helped to empower women and led to increased productivity as well as land market transactions (Deininger et al 2011a). Titles that include women in Argentina are also credited with having helped to reduce fertility and increase investment in children's human capital (Galiani and Schargrodsky 2004) although impacts arise through investment in physical and human capital rather than through improved credit access (Galiani and Schargrodsky 2010).…”
Section: Empirical Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, recent escalation of demand highlights that traditional systems are not without shortcomings, in particular (i) weak protection of community lands against abuse, e.g., by chiefs who perceive themselves as landlords rather than custodians of a vital community asset (Berry 2009); (ii) adoption of rules that explicitly disadvantage migrants and nonnationals even if they have long-established use rights (Colin and Ayouz 2006;Fenske 2010); and (iii) discrimination against women who generally have great difficulty holding on to land in the case of divorce or death of their husband (Deininger and Castagnini 2006). Third, low-cost and participatory mechanisms for land adjudication have been shown to be viable (Deininger et al 2008) and to lead to equitable outcomes that allow clear productivity gains over time (Deininger et al 2011a). This has not only brought land back to the policy agenda (Place 2009) but also creates a need for empirical evidence to help base decisions in this area on evidence regarding what works and what does not in a specific situation rather than broad generalizations and preconceived notions.…”
Section: The Debate On Land Tenure Formalization In Africamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, transfer of land rights through sales and exchange are not allowed which limits transferability of land between migrants and non-migrants (Zewdu andMalek 2013, World Bank 2015). 17 Land tenure insecurity and fear of losing the allocated land have further discouraged rural outmigration which has undermined farmers' incentives to make land investments, crucial to increase productivity levels, and slowed down the reallocation of labor to 31 non-farm and other remunerative activities in the urban sector (Deininger et al 2011, Chamberlain and Schmidt 2012, De Brauw and Mueller 2012. Moreover, this land tenure system has slowed down the rate of urbanization and thus the growth of cities in Ethiopia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the potential endogeneity of property rights perceptions is taken into account, transfer rights are found to have a significant positive impact (at a 10% testing level) on expectations that forestland will not be reallocated (see columns (2) and (3) in Table 3). But the estimated coefficients of use rights and mortgage rights do not differ significantly from zero, nor do the interaction terms of the three types of property rights.…”
Section: Property Rights Integrity and Perceived Tenure Securitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the study of farmland tenure security, an abundance of literature has identified three effects that land tenure security may have on economic outcomes, i.e., investment effect, market effect, and credit effect [2][3][4]. The decentralization of forest management in some developing countries, for example, Vietnam, Ecuador, and China, has allowed similar research to be extended to the area of forest tenure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%