2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0308-521x(03)00128-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact pathway evaluation: an approach for achieving and attributing impact in complex systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
160
0
16

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 202 publications
(178 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
160
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…The framework incorporates single or combined methods, suited in the transformative paradigm. It serves as a framework of reference for utilizing VGI to revolutionize traditional IPM which is rooted in positivism as mentioned by Douthwaite, et al [45]. Data collection and sense making may be conducted simultaneously (in a real-time manner) in the context of VGI.…”
Section: A Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The framework incorporates single or combined methods, suited in the transformative paradigm. It serves as a framework of reference for utilizing VGI to revolutionize traditional IPM which is rooted in positivism as mentioned by Douthwaite, et al [45]. Data collection and sense making may be conducted simultaneously (in a real-time manner) in the context of VGI.…”
Section: A Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, the impact pathway approach was introduced to try and deal with some of the shortcomings of both outcome mapping and impact chain analysis approaches (see Spinger-Heinze et al 2003 andDouthwaite et al 2003). The approach recognizes the presence of a number of impact chains and sequences in explaining the overall change process.…”
Section: Developing An Mande Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Il pourrait aussi s'avérer pertinent de donner plus de pouvoir aux acteurs locaux sur les priorités en termes d'innovation, sur l'utilisation des ressources financières ou sur le choix des approches (Waters-Bayer et al, 2015), même s'il ne faut pas surestimer la capacité des acteurs locaux à s'engager dans des processus parfois très chronophages (Tripp, 2009). Enfin, il s'agirait d'assurer un équilibre plus satisfaisant entre production académique ou technique, accompagnement flexible et dans la durée du « chemin d'impact » (Douthwaite et al, 2003), renforcement des capacités d'innovation (Leeuwis et al, 2014) et impact effectif en termes de développement, ce qui implique de rendre l'environnement plus favorable à l'innovation (Sulaiman et al, 2011).…”
Section: Comment Mieux Accompagner L'innovation En Afrique ?unclassified