2016 IEEE Computer Society Annual Symposium on VLSI (ISVLSI) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/isvlsi.2016.102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of VT and Body-Biasing on Resistive Short Detection in 28nm UTBB FDSOI -- LVT and RVT Configurations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to reduce the influence of the high threshold voltage, the input transistors of both the CSA and the pulse shaper modules have been optimized based on conventional LVT operations [ 57 ]. In fact, LVT devices have a higher current density and transconductance than regular threshold voltage (RVT) transistors for the same bias conditions, which enforces the previous suitable applications, commented [ 58 , 59 ]. Furthermore, LVT transistors have higher transconductance efficiency, so for low power applications, LVT MOSFETS are recommended.…”
Section: Simulation Outcomes and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In order to reduce the influence of the high threshold voltage, the input transistors of both the CSA and the pulse shaper modules have been optimized based on conventional LVT operations [ 57 ]. In fact, LVT devices have a higher current density and transconductance than regular threshold voltage (RVT) transistors for the same bias conditions, which enforces the previous suitable applications, commented [ 58 , 59 ]. Furthermore, LVT transistors have higher transconductance efficiency, so for low power applications, LVT MOSFETS are recommended.…”
Section: Simulation Outcomes and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…RVT devices have lower VDSsat than LVT MOSFETs. The fact that for applications that need lower supply voltages and do not need require high gains RVT devices are a good choice [ 58 , 59 ]. In addition, LVT transistors present slightly lower parasitic capacitances than RVT transistors, which involves that LVT devices are more suitable for high-frequency applications than the RVT [ 58 , 59 , 60 ].…”
Section: Simulation Outcomes and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…According to the principle and electrical characteristics of FDSOI devices, the physical parameters of devices, such as gate length, buried oxygen layer thickness, bulk doping concentration and metal work function, have great influence on the I d -V g curve of devices [19][20][21][22]. Therefore, these four physical parameters are taken as the input of I d -V g curve prediction.…”
Section: Transfer Characteristic Curve Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of n coefficient, also called "body factor" is around 85 mV/V for a pristine device [14]. For this study we have used two types of FDSOI transistors [15]: low threshold voltage (LVT) and regular threshold voltage (RVT) transistors, depicted in Figure 1. RVT transistors are built on a standard well while LVT ones are built on a flip well.…”
Section: B Back-gate Biasmentioning
confidence: 99%