2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117494
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Impact of the hybrid electric architecture on the performance and emissions of a delivery truck with a dual-fuel RCCI engine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While a hybrid system itself can lead to a fuel saving potential of 6-8% [33,34], an intelligent EMS can add up to 2% fuel saving. Further fuel saving measures such as e-components and a waste heat recovery (WHR) system can add another 3% [35,36] and 4-5% [37,38], respectively. The design of the powertrain and auxiliaries itself is of significance, as well as the control of the powertrain, as documented in [39,40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a hybrid system itself can lead to a fuel saving potential of 6-8% [33,34], an intelligent EMS can add up to 2% fuel saving. Further fuel saving measures such as e-components and a waste heat recovery (WHR) system can add another 3% [35,36] and 4-5% [37,38], respectively. The design of the powertrain and auxiliaries itself is of significance, as well as the control of the powertrain, as documented in [39,40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Net FE benefits when fully loaded on a highway cycle have been estimated at between 5.2% and 13% compared to the conventional baseline. Under transient driving conditions of an urban cycle, FE benefits approaching 38% have been predicted [51][52][53]. Compared to the parallel hybrid configuration over long-haul drive cycles, the PSH design exhibits 0.5% to 2% higher FE improvement and 2% to 3% better engine BTE [132,140,141].…”
Section: Full Hybrid-series Hybrid Configuration For Lhts (Sh-lht)mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As a result, the additional energy conversion losses combined with limited regenerative brake opportunities lead to limited FE improvements [88,133]. Various studies have shown fuel economy penalties of between 5% and 16% with high loads on highway drive cycles [51,52]. An SH-LHT in urban driving does show significant potential, with up to 18% fuel economy improvements, due to the greater opportunities for regenerative braking and lower average load demand on the engine [133].…”
Section: Full Hybrid-series Hybrid Configuration For Lhts (Sh-lht)mentioning
confidence: 99%